Oracle Exam 1Z0-900 Topic 3 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-900 exam

Question #: 59
Topic #: 3

[All 1Z0-900 Questions]

Given the code fragment from a Facelet page:

On Line 1, you ae asked to insert a search box that displays the text ''Search Here'' via a placeholder.

Assume searchMB is a valid Managed Bean.

Which two options enable you to create a search box with a placeholder attribute on Line 1? (Choose two.)

A<h:inputText value=''#(searchMB.query)''><f:param name=''placeholder'' value=''Search Here''/></h:inputText>

B<h:inputText value=''#(searchMB.query)'' placeholder=''Search here''/>

C<input jsf:id=''search'' placeholder=''Search here'' jsf:value=''# (searchMB.query)''></input>

D<h:inputText pt:placeholder=''Search Here'' value=''#(searchMB.query)''/>

E<input id=''search'' jsf:placeholder=''Search Here'' value=''$(searchMB.query)''></input>

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Margart at Feb 25, 2023, 01:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aja

29 days ago

Personally, I think Option B is the cleanest and most intuitive solution. Sometimes the simplest approach is the best.

upvoted 0 times

Ena

1 days ago

I prefer Option B as well, it's straightforward and easy to understand.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karina

4 days ago

I think Option A could work too, but Option B is simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

7 days ago

I agree, Option B is definitely the cleanest choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michel

8 days ago

I agree, Option B is definitely the cleanest choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzan

1 months ago

Ha! Option E is just ridiculous. Using a dollar sign for the value attribute? That's some serious JavaScript envy right there.

upvoted 0 times

Noe

2 days ago

User1: I think so too, it's a simple and clean solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

20 days ago

User3: Option B seems like the correct choice for adding a placeholder.

upvoted 0 times

...

Callie

1 months ago

User2: Yeah, it looks like they mixed up JavaScript with JSF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

1 months ago

User1: I agree, option E is definitely not the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

2 months ago

Option C seems a bit strange. Using the JSF namespace on an HTML input element feels like a mix of technologies that might not work as expected.

upvoted 0 times

Lavonda

23 days ago

User 2: Yeah, mixing JSF namespace with HTML input element might cause issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

25 days ago

User 1: I agree, option C does seem a bit strange.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karl

2 months ago

I think Option D is the way to go. Using the pt:placeholder attribute ensures compatibility with older browsers that may not support the standard placeholder attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

2 months ago

Option B looks good to me. The placeholder attribute is directly set on the h:inputText component, which is the most straightforward way to achieve the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Troy

11 days ago

User4: Yeah, option B is the most straightforward and clean solution for this requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

13 days ago

User3: Option B is definitely the way to go for adding a placeholder to the search box.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

21 days ago

User2: I agree, setting the placeholder directly on the h:inputText seems like the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keena

1 months ago

User1: I think option B is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sonia

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work since it uses f:param to add the placeholder attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

2 months ago

I agree with Hoa. Option B seems like the most straightforward choice for adding a placeholder.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

2 months ago

I think option B is correct because it directly includes the placeholder attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...