Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-829 Topic 2 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-829 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-829 Questions]

Given the code fragment:

What is the result?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The code fragment compares four pairs of strings using the equals() and intern() methods. The equals() method compares the content of two strings, while the intern() method returns a canonical representation of a string, which means that it returns a reference to an existing string with the same content in the string pool. The string pool is a memory area where strings are stored and reused to save space and improve performance. The results of the comparisons are as follows:

s1.equals(s2): This returns true because both s1 and s2 have the same content, ''Hello Java 17''.

s1 == s2: This returns false because s1 and s2 are different objects with different references, even though they have the same content. The == operator compares the references of two objects, not their content.

s1.intern() == s2.intern(): This returns true because both s1.intern() and s2.intern() return a reference to the same string object in the string pool, which has the content ''Hello Java 17''. The intern() method ensures that there is only one copy of each distinct string value in the string pool.

''Hello Java 17'' == s2: This returns false because ''Hello Java 17'' is a string literal, which is automatically interned and stored in the string pool, while s2 is a string object created with the new operator, which is not interned by default and stored in the heap. Therefore, they have different references and are not equal using the == operator.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dottie
1 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'm going to go with B as well. Null pointer exceptions are the bane of every Java developer's existence, but they're the right call in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
1 months ago
Haha, this question is a real 'cat-astrophe'! But I'm going with B. A NullPointerException is the only logical answer here. You can't call methods on a null object, that's just basic Java.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
10 days ago
I agree with you, B seems like the correct answer. NullPointerException is a common error when trying to access methods on a null object.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ligia
2 months ago
I think the answer is D. The first 'animal' object is printed as 'Cat', but the second one is null, so the output should be 'Cat null'.
upvoted 0 times
Dorthy
16 days ago
The first 'animal' object is printed as 'Cat', but the second one is null, so the output should be 'Cat null'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
18 days ago
The first 'animal' object is printed as 'Cat', but the second one is null, so the output should be 'Cat null'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
1 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
2 months ago
The correct answer is B. A NullPointerException is thrown because the 'animal' variable is not initialized, so calling the getName() method on it will result in a NullPointerException.
upvoted 0 times
Viva
1 months ago
I agree, calling getName() on an uninitialized variable will result in a NullPointerException
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
2 months ago
I think the answer is B
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
2 months ago
But why do you think that? Can you explain your rationale?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Cat null.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) A NullPointerException is thrown Cat Cat.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77