Oracle Exam 1Z0-829 Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-829 exam

Question #: 15
Topic #: 2

[All 1Z0-829 Questions]

Given the directory structure:

Given the definition of the Doc class:

Which two are valid definition of the wordDoc class?

APackage p1;
Public non-sealed class wordDoc extends Doc ()

BPackage p1;
Public class wordDoc extends Doc ()

CPackage p1, p2;
Public non-sealed class WordDoc extends Doc ()

DPackage p1, p2;
Public sealed class WordDoc extends Doc ()

EPackage p1,
non-sealed abstract class WordDoc extends Doc ()

FPackage p1;
Public final class WordDoc extends Doc ()

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Abel at May 01, 2024, 02:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-829 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Amira

1 months ago

Wait, there's a 'wordDoc' class and a 'WordDoc' class? Looks like someone had a bit of a typo crisis in the office that day.

upvoted 0 times

Mohammad

2 days ago

C) Package p1, p2; Public non-sealed class WordDoc extends Doc ()

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharan

3 days ago

B) Package p1; Public class wordDoc extends Doc ()

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimbery

5 days ago

A) Package p1; Public non-sealed class wordDoc extends Doc ()

upvoted 0 times

...

Melodie

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and F. Maybe I'll just flip a coin and hope for the best. 50/50 odds, right? *nervous laughter*

upvoted 0 times

Stephaine

21 days ago

User 3: Why not just choose one and see what happens? Good luck!

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

1 months ago

User 2: I'm leaning towards option F, it seems more secure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleni

1 months ago

User 1: I think option B is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

2 months ago

Option E seems a bit odd - an abstract non-sealed class? That's a bit of a contradiction, isn't it?

upvoted 0 times

Theodora

18 days ago

Definitely, it's important to pay attention to details like that when defining classes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

1 months ago

I agree, it seems like a mistake in the options provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronald

1 months ago

Option E is indeed contradictory, an abstract non-sealed class doesn't make much sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

2 months ago

I'd go with option F. Making the class final ensures that it can't be extended, which might be the intended behavior here.

upvoted 0 times

Georgiana

4 days ago

Yes, final classes provide a level of security by preventing any further extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noble

11 days ago

Final classes are a good way to ensure that the class cannot be extended further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

19 days ago

I agree, option F seems like the most appropriate choice in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

1 months ago

Option F is a good choice. Making the class final is a good way to prevent it from being extended.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elina

2 months ago

Option B looks good to me. A simple public class that extends the Doc class in the p1 package.

upvoted 0 times

Nicholle

2 months ago

I agree, Option B is the correct choice. It follows the correct syntax for extending a class in a specific package.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicholle

2 months ago

Option B looks good to me. A simple public class that extends the Doc class in the p1 package.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

2 months ago

Hmm, you might be right. I see your point.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is correct because it uses the 'sealed' keyword.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

2 months ago

I think option A is valid because it extends the Doc class.

upvoted 0 times

...