Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-822 Topic 6 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-822 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 6
[All 1Z0-822 Questions]

You configured a limit of 100 LWPs project. You want to ensure that the LWP limit was not set too low, so you need to monitor the LWPs currently in use by the project. Which two options could you use to monitor the current LWP resource control and the consumption of resources for this project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alba
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of 'how do I monitor my LWPs?' I'd say D and F are the way to go, unless you're feeling particularly adventurous and want to try out the 'prtcl $$' option. I hear it's the new 'tail -f /dev/random' for sysadmins.
upvoted 0 times
Vanda
5 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Those seem like the most reliable choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
23 days ago
I think D and F are the best options for monitoring LWPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilburn
2 months ago
Hmm, D and F seem like the way to go. Although, if I had a bunch of these projects, maybe I'd just set up a script to check the LWP usage every minute. That way, I can stay on top of it without drowning in syslog messages.
upvoted 0 times
Kaycee
20 days ago
Yeah, that way you can stay on top of it without getting overwhelmed by syslog messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
22 days ago
Setting up a script to check the usage every minute sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
1 months ago
I think D and F are good options to monitor the LWP usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Armanda
2 months ago
C? Really? That's just going to give me a list of process IDs, not the LWP usage. I'm sticking with D and F.
upvoted 0 times
Azalee
1 months ago
Yeah, C won't give us the information we need. Let's go with D and F to monitor the LWP usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
1 months ago
I agree, D and F are the better options for monitoring LWP resource control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 months ago
C? Really? That's just going to give me a list of process IDs, not the LWP usage. I'm sticking with D and F.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kassandra
2 months ago
I'd go with D and F. Monitoring the task.max-lwps directly and setting up syslog alerts seems like a comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
2 months ago
A and D seem like the best options to monitor the LWP usage. I'm not sure what prtcl is, and the syslog option seems like overkill for this task.
upvoted 0 times
Helene
26 days ago
I agree, prtcl and syslog options seem unnecessary for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
27 days ago
I agree, prtcl and syslog options seem unnecessary for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
28 days ago
A and D are indeed the best options to monitor the LWP usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
29 days ago
A and D are indeed the best options for monitoring LWP usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jade
2 months ago
I prefer option E) rctladm --l task.max-lwps because it allows us to monitor the consumption of resources for the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
3 months ago
I agree with Elza. Option C) provides information on the LWPs currently in use by the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
3 months ago
I think option C) ps --o taskid --p could be used to monitor the current LWP resource control.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77