Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-820 Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-820 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 8
[All 1Z0-820 Questions]

You need to set up a local package repository to serve 75 client systems. Multiple clients will being the package repository concurrently and you need to ensure that the local repository performs very well under this heavy load, especially during package intensive operations.

Which option would ensure the best performance of the repository during package-intensive rations by multiple clients?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shaniqua
13 days ago
Option D seems a bit overkill. Why clone the entire server when a read-only mirror would be more efficient and less resource-intensive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
14 days ago
Haha, option E would be like trying to drink from a firehose. Deploying a local repo on each client? That's just asking for chaos!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
18 days ago
That's a good point, having a read writable mirror could definitely help with the heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
19 days ago
I disagree, I believe option B would be more effective with a read writable mirror.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
19 days ago
I agree, C is the way to go. Distributing the load across multiple servers is key, and a read-only mirror is perfect for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
20 days ago
Option C makes the most sense here. A read-only mirror would provide the best performance under heavy load, as the clients would be able to access the packages from the mirror without putting any write load on the primary repository.
upvoted 0 times
Caprice
18 hours ago
Clients can access packages from the mirror without putting any write load on the primary repository.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
4 days ago
A read-only mirror would provide the best performance under heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
5 days ago
Option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krystina
21 days ago
I think option A would be the best choice to ensure good performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
24 days ago
That's a good point, having a clone could definitely help with performance during heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
26 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D would be better because it would provide a clone of the primary server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
27 days ago
I think option A would be the best choice to ensure good performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77