Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-820 Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-820 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 8
[All 1Z0-820 Questions]

You need to set up a local package repository to serve 75 client systems. Multiple clients will being the package repository concurrently and you need to ensure that the local repository performs very well under this heavy load, especially during package intensive operations.

Which option would ensure the best performance of the repository during package-intensive rations by multiple clients?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shaniqua
2 months ago
Option D seems a bit overkill. Why clone the entire server when a read-only mirror would be more efficient and less resource-intensive?
upvoted 0 times
Amira
5 days ago
B) Deploy a second instance of the package repository server to run as a read writable mirror.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
13 days ago
Option D might be useful for redundancy, but C seems more efficient in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
23 days ago
C) Deploy a second instance of the package repository server to run as a read-only mirror.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
29 days ago
C) Deploy a second instance of the package repository server to run as a read-only mirror.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
1 months ago
A) Set up multipathing on the package repository server to distribute the network load multiple network interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
1 months ago
C) Deploy a second instance of the package repository server to run as a read-only mirror.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 months ago
A) Set up multipathing on the package repository server to distribute the network load multiple network interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
A) Set up multipathing on the package repository server to distribute the network load multiple network interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Owen
2 months ago
Haha, option E would be like trying to drink from a firehose. Deploying a local repo on each client? That's just asking for chaos!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
2 months ago
That's a good point, having a read writable mirror could definitely help with the heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B would be more effective with a read writable mirror.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
2 months ago
I agree, C is the way to go. Distributing the load across multiple servers is key, and a read-only mirror is perfect for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
2 months ago
Option C makes the most sense here. A read-only mirror would provide the best performance under heavy load, as the clients would be able to access the packages from the mirror without putting any write load on the primary repository.
upvoted 0 times
Caprice
2 months ago
Clients can access packages from the mirror without putting any write load on the primary repository.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
2 months ago
A read-only mirror would provide the best performance under heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
2 months ago
Option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krystina
2 months ago
I think option A would be the best choice to ensure good performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
3 months ago
That's a good point, having a clone could definitely help with performance during heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D would be better because it would provide a clone of the primary server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
3 months ago
I think option A would be the best choice to ensure good performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77