Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-820 Topic 2 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-820 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-820 Questions]

United States of America export laws include restrictions on cryptography.

Identify the two methods with which these restrictions are accommodated in the Oracle Solaris 11 Cryptographic Framework.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vivan
1 months ago
Wait, so they're saying I need to get my encryption modules signed by Oracle? That sounds like a hassle. Can't I just use a nice, trustworthy 3rd-party provider instead?
upvoted 0 times
Lorrine
3 days ago
User 2: I think using a trusted 3rd-party provider is also an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
9 days ago
User 1: Yeah, it seems like Oracle wants everything signed with their certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'd go with C and D, but I'm curious to see if there's some obscure rule about signed X.509 certs that I'm missing.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
16 days ago
User3: I'm not sure, but I think we should also consider A and B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
1 months ago
User2: I agree, those seem like the most logical choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
1 months ago
User1: I think C and D are the correct methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominic
2 months ago
Haha, imagine if they made you use a 64-bit key for systems going to embargoed countries. Might as well just use a paperclip for encryption!
upvoted 0 times
Emile
18 hours ago
User 2: I know right, a paperclip would probably be more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
2 days ago
User 1: Yeah, that would be pretty weak encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
4 days ago
Rosendo: Probably not very secure at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
8 days ago
User 3: I wonder how effective that really is in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
20 days ago
User 2: I know right, it's like using a toy lock on a safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
2 months ago
User 1: Yeah, that would be pretty weak encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Taryn
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Let's wait for more opinions before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C, as it involves registering with the Cryptographic Framework SPI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the specifics, but I know the U.S. has strict export laws on cryptography. Option E sounds a bit too specific, though.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, option D seems to be the most relevant in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
User 1: I think option D is correct, third-party providers need to use trusted certificates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nicholle
2 months ago
Options C and D seem to be the correct answer. The Cryptographic Framework requires kernel modules to register, and third-party providers must use trusted X.509 certs.
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
19 days ago
That's good to know for compliance with export laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
27 days ago
And third-party providers must use trusted X.509 certificates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
28 days ago
Yes, the Cryptographic Framework does require kernel modules to register.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
1 months ago
I think you're right, options C and D do seem to be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Taryn
3 months ago
I think the answer is D, because it mentions trusted Root Certification Authorities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77