Haha, option D sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie. Sending a signal to each server in the pool? That's just overkill. I'm going with option C, it seems the most logical and efficient approach.
I think option B is the right answer. Restoring a server pool should reset it to its initial state, removing all servers and data from the database. That's the most straightforward way to handle a server pool restore.
I'm not sure about the correct answer, but option D seems a bit unrealistic. Sending a signal to each server to get the VM data sounds like a lot of unnecessary overhead just to restore a server pool.
Option A seems like the most logical choice. It makes sense that the data in the server pool master and virtual machine servers would be used to restock the database.
Option C seems the most accurate to me. The server pool master is responsible for syncing the latest information with the individual servers, so it makes sense that restoring the server pool would delete the data in the master and sync it with the database.
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also be a possibility. It mentions sending a signal to each server in the pool to restore the data in the Oracle VM database.
Dortha
1 months agoKenneth
11 days agoGerald
12 days agoLouisa
19 days agoTimothy
2 months agoNorah
7 days agoEulah
1 months agoGlenn
1 months agoShay
2 months agoJeff
15 days agoBobbye
26 days agoMargurite
2 months agoJannette
2 months agoAlberta
21 days agoEric
22 days agoGermaine
27 days agoAudry
28 days agoErnest
1 months agoDewitt
1 months agoDevorah
2 months agoJunita
2 months agoDortha
2 months ago