Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-588 Topic 1 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-588 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-588 Questions]

Your organization has two ERPs: PeopleSoft (PS) and SAP. Each ERP has its own chart of accounts. Each chart of accounts is mapped to a consolidated chart of accounts. The Finance department maintains the consolidated account hierarchy, For both the SAP and PS account properties, users should be able to select from a drop-down list the correct accounts that should be mapped to the consolidated account. Many SAP or PS accounts could be mapped to a single consolidated account.

What property type should you set for the SAP Account Property and PS Account Property, assuming that you have built the SAP and PS chart of account hierarchies in DRM?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kristal
29 days ago
I don't know about you, but I'm feeling a bit like a SAP-er right now, trying to figure out this question. B) List is my final answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up with all these obscure property types. But I'm sticking with B) List, it's the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
1 months ago
E) RangeList seems a bit too specific for this use case. I'm going to go with B) List - it's the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
Estrella
13 days ago
C) AscNodes might be too complex for this mapping process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
15 days ago
I think A) Lookup could also work well for mapping the SAP and PS accounts to the consolidated account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
17 days ago
I agree, B) List is the most straightforward option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
My
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Could it be D) AscNode? That sounds like it might allow for the hierarchical mapping of accounts.
upvoted 0 times
Dorian
3 days ago
User1: Yeah, that makes sense. AscNode should work well for mapping the accounts to the consolidated chart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
11 days ago
User2: I agree, it seems like AscNode would allow for the hierarchical mapping of accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
13 days ago
User1: I think D) AscNode is the correct property type for both SAP and PS accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marica
2 months ago
I'm not sure about Lookup. Wouldn't List be a better option for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) List. It makes sense to have a drop-down list of consolidated accounts for users to select from for both the SAP and PS account properties.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
1 months ago
Yes, a drop-down list would definitely simplify the mapping process for both SAP and PS accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
2 months ago
I agree, having a drop-down list would make it easier for users to select the correct accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
2 months ago
I agree with Kaycee. Lookup would allow users to select from a drop-down list, which is necessary for mapping to the consolidated account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
3 months ago
I think we should set the property type as Lookup for both SAP and PS accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77