Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-533 Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-533 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-533 Questions]

What are the two possible effects on the database when the data storage property of a parent

member in the sparse Entity dimension is set to Dynamic Calc?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Katina
2 months ago
A, B, and C all sound plausible, but I'm leaning towards C. Gotta love these tricky Essbase questions, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Irma
8 days ago
Let's go with C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
23 days ago
Yeah, it's definitely a tricky question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
1 months ago
I agree, retrieval performance could be slower with Dynamic Calc.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 months ago
I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kami
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe I'll just flip a coin and hope for the best. Wouldn't be the first time I've done that on an exam!
upvoted 0 times
Willard
1 months ago
I would go with B) The member is not available for process management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) Retrieval performance could be slower when referencing the parent entity member.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleni
2 months ago
I'm going with D. Data cannot be input to the parent in target versions. Seems like the most logical option to me.
upvoted 0 times
Tony
14 days ago
I'm leaning towards A. Essbase data block size decrease seems like a valid effect of setting the data storage property to Dynamic Calc.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
15 days ago
I agree with you on D. It makes sense that data input to the parent would be restricted in target versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
16 days ago
I think C is also a possible effect. Retrieval performance could be slower when referencing the parent entity member.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
19 days ago
I'm going with D. Data cannot be input to the parent in target versions. Seems like the most logical option to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
1 months ago
I'm still leaning towards D. Data cannot be input to the parent in target versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
2 months ago
I agree with you on A. That makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I believe A is the right choice. Essbase data block size decrease.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
2 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. Retrieval performance could be slower when referencing the parent entity member.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
That's a good point, Abel. It could be one of the effects too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
2 months ago
But wouldn't decreasing the Essbase data block size be a possible effect as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 months ago
I agree with Ellsworth, it makes sense that referencing the parent entity member could be slower.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
3 months ago
I think setting the data storage property to Dynamic Calc could slow down retrieval performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Retrieval performance could be slower when referencing the parent entity member. That makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but A could also be a possible effect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 months ago
I think it could also be D, data cannot be input to the parent in target versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77