Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-519 Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-519 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 6
[All 1Z0-519 Questions]

Review the organization structure regarding the inventory organizations (JO) and sales organizations (SO).

The sales organizations would not transact Inventory Kerns.

IO 2 would not be used right away, but would be created during the implementation.

What is the minimum number of sub inventories required for this implementation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Micheal
30 days ago
I bet the person who wrote this question was having a really good time. They're probably sitting back, laughing at all of us scratching our heads. Still, I'm going with C. Seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
1 months ago
Sixteen subinventories? Seriously? That's overkill, even for a geek like me. I'm sticking with C and hoping for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I'm feeling a bit like a kid in a candy store with all these options. Maybe I should just close my eyes and point?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 months ago
Well, well, well, looks like we've got a real brain-teaser here. I'm going to go with my gut and choose option C. After all, who needs more than eight subinventories when you can keep it simple?
upvoted 0 times
Charisse
8 days ago
Yeah, option C does seem like the logical choice. It's always best to start with the minimum required and then adjust as needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
11 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the most straightforward approach. It's important to have a minimum of one subinventory for each organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
14 days ago
I think option C is a good choice. Keeping it simple with one subinventory for each organization sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
2 months ago
I'm not buying the logic behind option D. Ten subinventories? That's way too many for this scenario. I think C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Jules
25 days ago
Definitely, it's about finding the right number without overcomplicating things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
1 months ago
Yeah, having at least one subinventory for each organization seems like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
2 months ago
I think C makes sense too. It's important to have a balance in subinventories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 months ago
I agree, option D does seem excessive. C sounds more reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruth
2 months ago
That makes sense, I see your point. So, the answer must be C) eight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C, eight subinventories, since the question clearly states that the sales organizations would not transact inventory items.
upvoted 0 times
Renea
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical choice based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
2 months ago
I think option C makes sense. Each organization needs at least one subinventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ollie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is eight because both inventory and sales organizations need at least one subinventory each.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
2 months ago
I think the minimum number of sub inventories required is four.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77