Oracle Exam 1Z0-518 Topic 5 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-518 exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 5

XYZ Corp. has operations In the U.S. and Canada. Within Canada, it has two separate Divisions due to Statutory requirements: one in Quebec and another in Ontario. How would you define the organization structure for XYZ Corp. from the Information given above?

Atwo Ledgers, two Legal Entitles, and two Operating Units

Btwo Ledgers, two Legal Entitles, and three Operating Units

Ctwo Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and two Operating Units

Dtwo Ledgers, three Legal Entitles, and three Operating Units

Ethree Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and three Operating Units

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D, E

by Jesus at Jun 18, 2024, 12:14 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-518 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kimbery

2 months ago

I'm going to have to go with option E - three Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and three Operating Units. It's like they're playing a game of corporate Tetris up in here!

upvoted 0 times

Millie

2 days ago

I'm not sure, but I think option B - two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units could also be a possibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonzo

3 days ago

I agree with you, option A makes the most sense based on the information given.

upvoted 0 times

...

Princess

13 days ago

I think option A is the correct one - two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and two Operating Units.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

2 months ago

Okay, time to put on my corporate hat. I'm gonna go with option A - two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and two Operating Units. Simple and straight-forward, like a good old-fashioned maple syrup factory.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

2 months ago

Alright, let's get this party started! I'm thinking C - two Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and two Operating Units. It's like a corporate version of the Hokey Pokey, you put your Quebec in, you put your Ontario out...

upvoted 0 times

Lino

1 months ago

That's a good point. Maybe having three operating units would provide better control and oversight for XYZ Corp.'s operations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

1 months ago

But wouldn't having three operating units make more sense for managing operations in both countries?

upvoted 0 times

...

Adaline

2 months ago

Yeah, having two legal entities for Quebec and Ontario would ensure compliance with statutory requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alisha

2 months ago

I think C sounds right too. It makes sense to have separate legal entities for each division.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

2 months ago

This is a classic case of corporate restructuring gone wild. I'm gonna go with D - two Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and three Operating Units. Why make it simple when you can make it complicated, right?

upvoted 0 times

Ceola

1 months ago

I agree, it's definitely a case of making things more complicated than they need to be.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wayne

2 months ago

I think D is the right answer too. It does seem like they like to keep things complex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamesha

2 months ago

I think the answer is B) two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units. It makes sense to have an extra Operating Unit for each Division in Canada.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) two Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and two Operating Units.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miles

2 months ago

Hmm, looks like we've got a tricky one here. I'm gonna go with option B - two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units. Gotta keep those Canadians happy, eh?

upvoted 0 times