Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-518 Topic 1 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-518 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-518 Questions]

Ten analysts are assigned the same Receivables responsibility and are given their own logins. The requirement is to restrict three of the analysts from creating charge backs or adjustments. What would be your advice to ensure compliance with this internal control?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chanel
2 months ago
Haha, option E is like giving the three analysts the keys to the AR kingdom. Nice try, but I'll have to go with C to keep those troublemakers in check.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
16 days ago
I think C is the most secure option to prevent any unauthorized actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
18 days ago
Yeah, option E does seem a bit risky. C is definitely the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best way to restrict their access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
2 months ago
Option D? Really? Giving the three analysts the ability to perform the restricted actions is the opposite of what we're trying to achieve here. I'd have to go with C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Estrella
8 days ago
Using forms personalization to restrict function access seems like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 months ago
I think option C is the best choice to restrict the three analysts from creating charge backs or adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
2 months ago
I agree, option D doesn't make sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
I'm not sure about forms personalization, that seems a bit overkill for this scenario. I'd go with option C as well, it's a clean and straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the way to go. Restricting the function access at the user level seems like the most targeted approach to ensure the three analysts can't create charge backs or adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
Chan
21 days ago
True, setting it at the user level for those specific analysts would be the most precise solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 months ago
I think setting it at the user level gives more control over who can perform those actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
2 months ago
But wouldn't setting it at the responsibility level be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most direct way to restrict their access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but setting the system profile to no at the user level for the three analysts also seems like a viable option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
3 months ago
I agree with Deja, option A using forms personalization seems like the most efficient way to ensure compliance with the internal control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows us to restrict function access for the three analysts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77