Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-516 Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-516 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All 1Z0-516 Questions]

You have implemented a Commerce Constraint rule, which has an Advanced action. While testing, you find that the attribute values specified in the rule are not being constrained, even though the condition is always true.

What are two reasons for this behavior? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gerri
2 months ago
I hear the Commerce Constraint rule has a secret 'make it work' button, but you have to do the Macarena to unlock it.
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
12 days ago
B) Configuration was not deployed after the rule was implemented
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
16 days ago
B) Configuration was not deployed after the rule was implemented
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
26 days ago
A) The attribute is used as a condition for a Commerce Hiding rule
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
27 days ago
A) The attribute is used as a condition for a Commerce Hiding rule
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
2 months ago
I'm going with B and D on this one. Deployment is crucial, and an inactive rule is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. Somebody needs to double-check their work before they end up in the doghouse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
2 months ago
Hah, I bet the poor soul who implemented this rule is tearing their hair out right now. B and D, no doubt about it. Gotta deploy that config, and if the rule's inactive, it's not gonna do squat. Rookie mistake, but we've all been there, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
2 months ago
A and B, for sure. If the attribute is being used in a hiding rule, it's not gonna get constrained. And the deployment part is key - can't just set it and forget it, gotta make sure it's actually live.
upvoted 0 times
My
1 months ago
And deployment is crucial. Configuration needs to be deployed for the rule to take effect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
2 months ago
Yes, you're right. If the attribute is used in a hiding rule, it won't be constrained.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jordan
2 months ago
I believe the configuration was not deployed after the rule was implemented, that could also be a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
2 months ago
I agree with Lajuana. Another reason could be that the rule is inactive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
2 months ago
I think the reason could be that the attribute is used in a Commerce Hiding rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
2 months ago
Hmm, it's gotta be B and D. You can't just implement a rule and expect it to work, you need to deploy that configuration too. And if the rule is inactive, well, it's not gonna do anything, is it? Sounds like someone needs to check their work a little more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Sharen
1 months ago
Definitely, attention to detail is key in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
Always important to double check everything before testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
1 months ago
Yeah, and if the rule is inactive, it won't work no matter what.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
I think you're right, the configuration needs to be deployed after implementing the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mammie
2 months ago
I believe the configuration was not deployed after the rule was implemented, that could also be a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
3 months ago
I agree with Darell. Another reason could be that the rule is inactive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
3 months ago
I think the reason could be that the attribute is used in a Commerce Hiding rule.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77