Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-511 Topic 11 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-511 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 11
[All 1Z0-511 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

In your company's Expenditure/Event Organization Hierarchy, organization labor costing rules are assigned to all organizations except San Jose. What happens when you run the "PRC: Distribute labor costs" program for a timecard transaction entered by an employee from the San Jose organization?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

You can automatically create and baseline an Approved Revenue Budget for a project by checking the Baseline Funding without Budget check box in the Project Funding Inquiry window.

Note: Budget/Fund/Bill at Project or Top Task Level

You can create a revenue budget, funding source allocation and project agreement, and perform billing at either the project or the top task level. After you have created an allocation line at either level, you cannot change to another level. For example, if you have created a funding allocation for a top task, you cannot create another funding allocation for the same project without entering a top task.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Olene
1 months ago
This question is making me feel like I'm in a labor-inth of options. Guess I'll just have to 'cost' my luck!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
1 months ago
Wait, so the San Jose organization doesn't have a labor costing rule? I guess they're just 'coasting' along, huh?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 months ago
Option C sounds good to me. If there's a California rule, it should apply, even if San Jose is excluded.
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
5 days ago
I agree, the rule assigned for California should take precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
15 days ago
I think option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mose
1 months ago
Hmm, this is tricky. I'm leaning towards Option B, since the USA rule might take precedence. But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
Blossom
3 days ago
I agree with you. Option D seems to be the most logical choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
17 days ago
I think Option D is correct. Since no labor costing rule is assigned for San Jose, the program will ignore the transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quiana
2 months ago
I would go with Option E. Even if there's no rule assigned, the program should still process the transaction, but flag it as an exception.
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
5 days ago
I think it's important for the program to handle such cases and provide feedback on the missing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
6 days ago
Yeah, it makes sense that the program would still process the transaction but flag it as an exception.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
10 days ago
I agree, Option E seems like the most logical choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
2 months ago
Option D seems the most logical. If there is no labor costing rule assigned for San Jose, the program should ignore that transaction and complete normally.
upvoted 0 times
Sharee
27 days ago
Yes, that's what I think too. It would be the most logical outcome in that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
30 days ago
I agree, option D makes the most sense. The program should just ignore the transaction if there is no rule assigned for San Jose.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beckie
2 months ago
But if there's no labor costing rule assigned for San Jose, wouldn't the program ignore the transaction?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
3 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77