Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-497 Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-497 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All 1Z0-497 Questions]

A standby database is in mounted state and you are required to perform a failover to the physical standby. Which solution is best suited forthis scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rodney
1 months ago
I'm just going to guess and say option B. I mean, how hard can it be to perform a failover, right? As long as I don't accidentally blow up the database, I should be good.
upvoted 0 times
Gene
5 days ago
User3: Yeah, that seems like the safest option to ensure a successful failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
11 days ago
User2: I think you're right, it involves preparing and committing to a switchover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
20 days ago
User1: Option B sounds like the right choice for a failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
2 months ago
Hold on, are we sure we're not supposed to use the SWITCHOVER statements instead of the RECOVER statements? I'm a little confused, but I'm going to go with option D just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option A. The RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE statement with the FINISH keyword sounds like it could be the way to go for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
Nikita
7 days ago
Definitely, it's important to ensure a smooth failover process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
8 days ago
I agree, that seems like the most appropriate solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
11 days ago
Option A) ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE statement with the FINISH keyword
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lai
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option C might be the right choice as it mentions the RECOVER TO STANDBY DATABASE statement, which sounds relevant for a failover scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Herman
17 days ago
Let's go with option C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
20 days ago
I agree, using the RECOVER TO STANDBY DATABASE statement makes sense for a failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
1 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clarinda
2 months ago
Option B seems to be the correct solution since it involves the PREPARE TO SWITCHOVER and COMMIT TO SWITCHOVER statements, which are specifically designed for performing a failover to a physical standby database.
upvoted 0 times
Joanne
23 hours ago
That makes sense. It's important to use the right commands for a smooth failover process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
5 days ago
Yes, I agree. The PREPARE TO SWITCHOVER and COMMIT TO SWITCHOVER statements are specifically for failover to a physical standby.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
7 days ago
I think option B is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
15 days ago
Definitely. Using the correct commands ensures a smooth transition to the physical standby.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
16 days ago
That makes sense. It's important to use the right commands for a successful failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
27 days ago
Yes, I agree. The PREPARE TO SWITCHOVER and COMMIT TO SWITCHOVER statements are designed for failover to a physical standby.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 months ago
I think option B is the best solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Camellia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A) ALTER DATABASE RECOVER MANAGED STANDBY DATABASE statement with the FINISH keyword could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
I agree with Kate. Those statements are specifically designed for switching over to a physical standby.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
3 months ago
I think the best solution is B) ALTER DATABASE PREPARE TO SWITCHOVER and ALTER DATABASE COMMIT TO SWITCHOVER statements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77