Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-434 Topic 5 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-434 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 5
[All 1Z0-434 Questions]

You have developed a BPEL process with a Switch activity using the BPEL 1.1 specification. As part of the upgrade to SOA 12c, you are redesigning the

BPEL process to use the BPEL 2.0 specification.

Identify the right approach.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Norah
1 months ago
Hold up, are we sure there's no 'Flip a Coin' activity in BPEL 2.0? That would be a much more exciting way to handle this upgrade!
upvoted 0 times
Gary
5 days ago
User 2: I agree, that seems like the right approach for the upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
13 days ago
User 1: I think we should replace the Switch activity with an If activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omega
1 months ago
For Each? No way, that's not going to work at all. The Switch activity is all about branching based on conditions, not iterating over a collection.
upvoted 0 times
Germaine
15 days ago
B) Replace the Switch activity with an If activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 months ago
A) Replace the Switch activity with an If activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herschel
2 months ago
A Repeat Until activity? Really? That's just not the right tool for the job here. I think I'll have to go with option B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
24 days ago
Jutta: I'm leaning towards If activity as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
1 months ago
User 3: For Each activity could also work well in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
User 2: I think If activity would be a better fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, Repeat Until doesn't seem like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
2 months ago
I'm not sure why I would want to replace a Switch with a While activity. That seems like a strange choice that wouldn't really capture the same logic.
upvoted 0 times
Beatriz
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, the If activity would be more suitable for capturing the logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
1 months ago
User 1: I think replacing the Switch with an If activity would be a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
2 months ago
The BPEL 2.0 specification has a direct replacement for the Switch activity, which is the If activity. Using an If activity is the most straightforward approach to redesigning the BPEL process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
I'm not sure. I think replacing the Switch activity with a For Each activity could also work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
2 months ago
I agree with Sean. Using an If activity would be the right approach for the upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
3 months ago
I think we should replace the Switch activity with an If activity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77