Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-434 Topic 10 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-434 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 10
[All 1Z0-434 Questions]

When more than one policy is attached to a policy subject, the combination of policies needs to be valid.

Which statement is true about the valid combination of policies for a policy subject?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ronald
2 months ago
Wait, hold on, did someone say 'policy'? I thought this was a test about making the perfect cheese sandwich. Oops, my bad. Anyway, C sounds like the way to go, though I do enjoy a good policy party now and then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of policy combinations. I'm feeling a bit like a juggler here, trying to keep all these policies in the air. C seems like the safest bet, though. Wouldn't want to end up in a policy mosh pit, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Karl
25 days ago
D) Only one security policy can be attached to a policy subject
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
28 days ago
C) You cannot have both a Reliable Messaging policy and a WS-Addressing policy attached to the same policy subject
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
29 days ago
B) More than one Reliable Messaging policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
1 months ago
A) Only one MTOM policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenelle
2 months ago
Oof, this one's a real head-scratcher. I'm gonna have to go with D though. Gotta keep that security policy all to myself, no sharing allowed!
upvoted 0 times
Julieta
1 months ago
I agree, better safe than sorry when it comes to security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
1 months ago
D) Only one security policy can be attached to a policy subject
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
2 months ago
I think D is the correct answer too. Can't risk compromising security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
2 months ago
A) Only one MTOM policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olga
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be A) Only one MTOM policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Only one security policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
2 months ago
Whoa, hold up! I think B is the way to go. More than one Reliable Messaging policy? Sounds like a party to me! Who needs to play by the rules when you can just stack them up?
upvoted 0 times
Eleonore
1 months ago
D) Only one security policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 months ago
C) You cannot have both a Reliable Messaging policy and a WS-Addressing policy attached to the same policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
2 months ago
B) More than one Reliable Messaging policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 months ago
A) Only one MTOM policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aretha
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) You cannot have both a Reliable Messaging policy and a WS-Addressing policy attached to the same policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure the correct answer is C. I mean, it just doesn't make sense to have both a Reliable Messaging policy and a WS-Addressing policy on the same subject. That's like trying to put a square peg in a round hole, right?
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
1 months ago
D) Only one security policy can be attached to a policy subject
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 months ago
C) You cannot have both a Reliable Messaging policy and a WS-Addressing policy attached to the same policy subject
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 months ago
B) More than one Reliable Messaging policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 months ago
A) Only one MTOM policy can be attached to a policy subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77