Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-344 Topic 4 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-344 exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-344 Questions]

While you were deploying the UBE+AAP package, users were unable to run any application from the HTML, However, after the package deployment was complete, users able to run the same application.

What is the reason for this glitch?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Precious
30 days ago
Wait, did the question mention anything about the enterprise server being locked? I must have missed that part. Oh well, I'm just going to go with B and hope for the best. At least the users could run the app after the deployment, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
1 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'HTML server'? I thought this was a JD Edwards question. Maybe the HTML server was just feeling a little left out and decided to put on a little show during the deployment. Either way, I'm going with D.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
5 days ago
I think the HTML server was just trying to steal the spotlight during the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dwight
1 months ago
Haha, I'm picturing the server manager agent just taking a coffee break in the middle of the deployment. 'Sorry, folks, gotta recharge!' But seriously, I think option A is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
2 days ago
I agree, option A makes sense. The agent probably needed to restart during deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
17 days ago
Yeah, it seems like the server manager agent needed a little break.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audra
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with C on this one. The HTML server restarting during the deployment seems like the most logical explanation for the users' inability to run the app. Gotta love those unexpected server restarts, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Noe
13 days ago
Actually, I agree with you. The HTML server restarting makes the most sense in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
14 days ago
Yeah, unexpected server restarts can really throw a wrench in things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
17 days ago
I agree, the HTML server restarting during the deployment could have caused the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
24 days ago
No, I believe the HTML server was unable to poll relevant tables for a package change during the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
1 months ago
I think it was because the server manager agent was restarted during the package deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 months ago
I think it was because the server manager agent was restarted during the package deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beata
2 months ago
Ooh, I bet it's option D! The enterprise server getting locked during deployment and then becoming available again after the package is installed sounds like the most likely culprit. Package deployment can be tricky, but at least this one had a happy ending for the users.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
1 months ago
Yeah, it makes sense that the enterprise server being locked during deployment would cause issues for the users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
1 months ago
I think you're right, option D does seem like the most likely reason for the glitch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edgar
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D) also seems plausible as the enterprise server being in a locked state could have prevented users from running applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
2 months ago
I agree with Belen, option A) makes sense because restarting the server manager agent could have caused the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
3 months ago
I think the reason for the glitch could be option A) the server manager agent was restart during the package deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77