Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-342 Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-342 exam

Question #: 87
Topic #: 5

[All 1Z0-342 Questions]

Your client is attempting to track taxes for certain voucher pay Items; however, the tax information details for the accounts are not being created.

Which two items will you have your client correct?

AThe client is updating the Track Taxes field on the voucher GL Distribution to a value of 2.

BThe client is populating the taxable amount field when manually creating vouchers, to track taxes.
The gross amount field should be populated to allow the system to calculate and track the taxes.

CThe client is using tax explanation codes ST and VT that are only valid for invoices and not vouchers.

DThe client is reviewing information in the F0018R table; allocated tax amounts from the F0911 reside in the F0911 table.

EThe general ledger accounts Input on the GL Distribution form are not set up as taxable.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

by Gladys at Mar 06, 2024, 08:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-342 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Marilynn

5 days ago

Haha, the client is really digging through the wrong table. Option D is way off base.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

10 days ago

Using the wrong tax explanation codes is a common mistake. Option C seems to be the issue here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tandra

12 days ago

Populating the taxable amount field and the gross amount field is the way to go, according to Option B. Sounds like the client is on the right track.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

13 days ago

The client seems to be having trouble with the Track Taxes field on the voucher GL Distribution. Option A is definitely not the right solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

23 days ago

I'm not sure, I think option D could also be a valid correction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

25 days ago

I agree with Chuck, option B seems like the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chuck

29 days ago

I think the client should correct option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77