Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-342 Topic 3 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-342 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 3
[All 1Z0-342 Questions]

After reviewing the Ledger Type Rules Setup, your client has requested that you help them change their AA ledger to allow direct balance updates. This will save them time during month-end close.

Which item will you relay to your client?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Fannie
1 months ago
Haha, Option D is pretty clever! Changing the ledger type instead of the setup? That's a sneaky way to get around the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
8 days ago
User 3: I agree, sometimes thinking outside the box can be really helpful in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
13 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it's a creative solution to save time during month-end close.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
20 days ago
User 1: Option D does seem like a smart workaround.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Belen
2 months ago
Hmm, Option C makes sense, but it adds an extra step that could be a pain. I'd rather just focus on the AA ledger update and let the AU ledger take care of itself.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
18 days ago
I agree, focusing on the AA ledger update seems like the best approach. Let the AU ledger handle itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
27 days ago
Option D) Instead of changing the Ledger Type Setup, simply navigate to the budget programs, change the ledger type from BA to AA and make necessary updates. This will eliminate the need to continually update the Prevent Direct Balance Update check box.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
1 months ago
Option A) You may deselect the Prevent Direct Balance Update check box for the AA ledger; however, similar to the creation of a one-sided journal entry, allowing direct balance updates to the AA ledger should be used with extreme caution and restricted to only senior levels of the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
2 months ago
I disagree, Option B is too restrictive. The client needs the flexibility to update the AA ledger directly, even if it requires extra precautions.
upvoted 0 times
Linn
1 months ago
I understand your concern, but it's important to consider the potential risks involved in allowing direct balance updates to the AA ledger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
2 months ago
A) You may deselect the Prevent Direct Balance Update check box for the AA ledger; however, similar to the creation of a one-sided journal entry, allowing direct balance updates to the AA ledger should be used with extreme caution and restricted to only senior levels of the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also be a good choice. It mentions updating both amount and unit ledgers to avoid error messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
2 months ago
Option A seems like the way to go. We need to be cautious with direct balance updates, but it's the best solution to save time during month-end close.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
3 months ago
I agree with Willard. Option A seems like the safest option to relay to the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It provides a warning about using direct balance updates cautiously.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77