Oracle Exam 1Z0-342 Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-342 exam

Question #: 96
Topic #: 2

Your client used the Mass Asset Disposal program to dispose of several assets belonging to the same company. They used the simple disposal method but the business unit for the net book value account contained in the journal entry was different for almost every asset they disposed.

Which statement explains why this occurred?

AThe Mass Asset Disposal program selects the NBV account by company from the Disposal Account Rules and the business unit from the FX range of AAIs based on the cost account of the individual assets.

BThe Mass Asset Disposal program uses a combination of the Disposal Account Rules by company for the NBV account and the Location Business Unit field on the asset master record for the business unit.

CThe Disposal Account Rule for NBV did not contain a business unit value.

DThe Disposal Account Rules for the company were setup with multiple business units for the NBV account.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B, C

by Reita at Jul 03, 2024, 12:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-342 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Keneth

2 months ago

I bet the client was just trying to 'mass dispose' of their assets like a boss, but ended up creating a real 'mass confusion' instead!

upvoted 0 times

Christiane

26 days ago

C) The Disposal Account Rule for NBV did not contain a business unit value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

28 days ago

B) The Mass Asset Disposal program uses a combination of the Disposal Account Rules by company for the NBV account and the Location Business Unit field on the asset master record for the business unit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

1 months ago

A) The Mass Asset Disposal program selects the NBV account by company from the Disposal Account Rules and the business unit from the FX range of AAIs based on the cost account of the individual assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nenita

2 months ago

As an asset disposal expert, I can confidently say that Option B is the correct answer. The program uses a combination of rules and master data, just like a well-oiled machine.

upvoted 0 times

Kenda

1 months ago

I think Option A could also be a possibility. The program selects the NBV account by company and the business unit from the FX range of AAIs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tora

2 months ago

I agree with you, Option B makes the most sense. It's all about the combination of rules and master data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

2 months ago

Hah, the client must have really mixed things up! Option C is the way to go - the Disposal Account Rule for NBV didn't have a business unit value set, so the program just grabbed whatever it could find.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

2 months ago

But A makes more sense because it mentions selecting the NBV account by company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

2 months ago

I'm going with Option D. The Disposal Account Rules for the company were probably set up with multiple business units for the NBV account, leading to the inconsistency in the journal entries.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josphine

2 months ago

Option B seems the most reasonable explanation. The Mass Asset Disposal program likely uses a combination of the Disposal Account Rules and the asset master record to determine the business unit for the NBV account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

2 months ago

I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...