Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-184-25 Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-184-25 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-184-25 Questions]

Which of the following actions will result in an error when using VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT() in Oracle Database 23ai?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT() function in Oracle 23ai returns the number of dimensions in a VECTOR-type value (e.g., 512 for VECTOR(512, FLOAT32)). It's a metadata utility, not a validator of content or structure beyond type compatibility. Option B---using a vector with an unsupported data type---causes an error because the function expects a VECTOR argument; passing, say, a VARCHAR2 or NUMBER instead (e.g., '1,2,3' or 42) triggers an ORA-error (e.g., ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes). Oracle enforces strict typing for vector functions.

Option A (exceeding specified dimensions) is a red herring; the function reports the actual dimension count of the vector, not the column's defined limit---e.g., VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT(TO_VECTOR('[1,2,3]')) returns 3, even if the column is VECTOR(2), as the error occurs at insertion, not here. Option C (duplicate values, like [1,1,2]) is valid; the function counts dimensions (3), ignoring content. Option D (using TO_VECTOR()) is explicitly supported; VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT(TO_VECTOR('[1.2, 3.4]')) returns 2 without issue. Misinterpreting this could lead developers to over-constrain data prematurely---B's type mismatch is the clear error case, rooted in Oracle's vector type system.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Aliza
18 days ago
Wait, does option D mean the function doesn't work with vectors created using TO_VECTOR()? That would be a real head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
19 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Maybe option B? Using an unsupported data type could also cause trouble with this function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
20 days ago
I think option D is the correct answer because TO_VECTOR() might not be compatible with VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT().
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
27 days ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Providing a vector with a dimensionality that exceeds the specified dimension count should result in an error.
upvoted 0 times
Eveline
2 days ago
User 2: I agree, providing a vector with a dimensionality that exceeds the specified dimension count should result in an error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
9 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adolph
1 months ago
I think both A and B could potentially cause an error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the one that will cause an error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 months ago
I think option A will result in an error.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77