Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-184-25 Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-184-25 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-184-25 Questions]

You are asked to fetch the top five vectors nearest to a query vector, but only for a specific category of documents. Which query structure should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To fetch the top five nearest vectors for a specific category, combine relational filtering (e.g., WHERE category = 'X') with similarity search (C) (e.g., VECTOR_DISTANCE with ORDER BY and FETCH FIRST 5 ROWS). UNION ALL (A) is for combining result sets, not filtering. Omitting WHERE (B) ignores the category constraint. VECTOR_INDEX_HINT (D) influences index usage, not filtering, and skipping WHERE misses the requirement. Oracle's vector search examples use WHERE clauses with similarity functions for such tasks.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jerlene
27 days ago
This question is like a riddle wrapped in an enigma, wrapped in a vector search. I'm just gonna go with C and hope the exam gods are feeling generous today.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
29 days ago
Ah, the age-old debate: filters first or similarity search first? I say, why not do both? Just like a good salad, you need the right mix of greens and toppings. Option C all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Margart
10 days ago
Option C all the way! Apply relational filters and a similarity search in the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frank
1 months ago
I think C) is the best option because it combines filters with similarity search for more accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but D) Use VECTOR_INDEX_HINT and NO WHERE clause sounds like it could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
1 months ago
Hold up, did you say 'top five vectors'? I thought we were supposed to fetch the top five documents! This question is getting a bit tricky, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
1 months ago
Ah, but what if the category of documents is really specific? Using a WHERE clause might be too restrictive. I'd go with option D and use the VECTOR_INDEX_HINT to get the top results without any filters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 months ago
I agree with Judy, using relational filters will help narrow down the search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to do the similarity search first and then apply the filters? That way, we can focus the search on the most relevant documents.
upvoted 0 times
Ty
6 days ago
That's a good point! Applying the filters first would definitely help narrow down the search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
9 days ago
C) Apply relational filters and a similarity search in the query
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
13 days ago
That's a good point. Applying the filters first would definitely help narrow down the search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
20 days ago
A) Use UNION ALL with vector operations
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
20 days ago
C) Apply relational filters and a similarity search in the query
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
26 days ago
A) Use UNION ALL with vector operations
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Judy
1 months ago
I think we should use C) Apply relational filters and a similarity search in the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Applying the relational filters first and then doing the similarity search seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
24 days ago
Applying filters first can help narrow down the search results efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
25 days ago
I think using relational filters before the similarity search makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
27 days ago
I agree, option C sounds like the best choice for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a