Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-149 Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-149 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All 1Z0-149 Questions]

Which two statements are true about using the OR REPLACE clause when creating named subprograms? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bettina
1 months ago
I'm just here for the OR REPLACE clause puns. Anyone else thinking 'Replace, Rinse, Repeat'? No? Just me? Okay, I'll show myself out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
1 months ago
A and D, for sure. Function-based indexes are a life-saver, and modifying functions without dropping them is the way to go. High-five if you got this one right!
upvoted 0 times
Alexis
23 hours ago
Function-based indexes are a game-changer. A and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
8 days ago
Yes, modifying functions without dropping them is a great feature. High-five!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
21 days ago
I agree, A and D are the correct options. Function-based indexes are definitely useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rashad
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going with B and D. Gotta love those object privileges! *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Belen
9 days ago
I think B is a tricky one, but D is definitely true. It's great that you can modify a function without having to recreate it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
10 days ago
I'm not sure about B, but I know for sure that D is correct. Being able to modify a function without dropping it is a time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
12 days ago
I agree, it's important to remember to regrant object privileges. And being able to modify a function without dropping it is definitely a useful feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
16 days ago
Definitely, B and D are the correct statements. It's crucial to understand how the OR REPLACE clause works when creating named subprograms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
27 days ago
I agree, B and D seem like the right choices. It's important to remember to regrant privileges when replacing a function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 months ago
I think B is correct because object privileges need to be regranted. And D makes sense because you can modify a function without recreating it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
1 months ago
I think B is correct because object privileges need to be regranted. And D makes sense too, you can modify a function without dropping it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yesenia
2 months ago
I'm not sure about statement E, but I think statement A is true because it mentions that function based indexes remain usable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
2 months ago
E seems like the correct answer to me. Why would we need to regrrant privileges if the users already had them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
I agree with you, Leonardo. I also believe statement E is true as it mentions that object privileges are retained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
2 months ago
I think statement D is true because it allows modifying a function without recreating it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
2 months ago
I believe statement E is also true. It mentions that object privileges are retained for users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
2 months ago
I think D is the right answer. Being able to modify a function definition without dropping and re-creating it is a huge time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
Jin
29 days ago
I think E is also true, privileges are retained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
1 months ago
I agree, D is a time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
1 months ago
E is also correct, privileges are retained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
1 months ago
I agree, D is a time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
2 months ago
I agree with Lynda. Statement D makes sense for efficiency in managing named subprograms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
3 months ago
I think statement D is true because it allows modifying a function without dropping it.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77