Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-134 Topic 3 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-134 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 3
[All 1Z0-134 Questions]

You are designing an application that uses JMS transactions to coordinate a group of messages for production and consumption, treating messages sent or received as an atomic unit.

What are two ways you can use transactions in JMS? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marion
1 months ago
Transactions in JMS? Sounds like a real party. I'll just go with A and C, that way I can pretend to know what I'm doing. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Merilyn
2 days ago
Yeah, creating a JMS-transacted session and using message-driven beans are solid options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
3 days ago
I think A and C are good choices for using transactions in JMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adela
1 months ago
A and D for sure. Who needs those pesky durable consumers anyway? I'll just let the messages fly and hope for the best. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced about C. Nondurable consumers and message-driven beans? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'd go with A and B.
upvoted 0 times
Ruthann
1 days ago
Yeah, message-driven beans for nondurable consumers seem risky. A and B are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 days ago
I agree, using a JMS-transacted session with message acknowledgement control is a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reyes
2 months ago
Definitely A and B. Controlling the acknowledgement level is crucial for transactional messaging. D looks a bit sketchy to me.
upvoted 0 times
Eladia
10 days ago
Yes, controlling message acknowledgement is key for transactional messaging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
14 days ago
I think D could be risky, better stick with A and B for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
1 months ago
I agree, A and B are the way to go for JMS transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
2 months ago
A and D seem like the right options here. I'm not too sure about the message-driven beans though, that seems a bit specific.
upvoted 0 times
Lorenza
1 months ago
D) Use a JTA user-transactions in a non-transacted JMS session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
2 months ago
A) You create a JMS-transacted session if you are using only JMS in your transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulina
2 months ago
I agree with Hannah, but I also think option D is valid because it talks about using JTA user-transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
3 months ago
I think option A is correct because it mentions using JMS in transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77