Alright, let's see what we've got. A and B, that's the way to go. I mean, who hasn't forgotten to acknowledge a message or two? And the recover() method, classic. But the sender crashing? That's like something out of a sitcom. I wonder if they were trying to pull off some sort of message-sending epic fail.
Hmm, the JMSRedelivered header, huh? I'm guessing options A and B are the winners here. I mean, who doesn't love a good session recovery story? Though the sender crashing has a certain comedic flair to it. Maybe they were just really tired of dealing with all these messages, you know?
Okay, let's see... The message wasn't acknowledged, that makes sense. And restarting the session with recover()? Yep, that'll do it. But the sender crashing? That's like the plot of a bad soap opera. I think I'll stick to option A and B, keep it simple, you know?
Ah, the JMSRedelivered header, a telltale sign of some shenanigans! I'm pretty sure options A and B are the correct scenarios here. Calling recover() to restart the session? Classic move. Though I've gotta say, the sender crashing after sending the message is a real plot twist. Where's the drama, people?
Tracey
2 months agoKerrie
7 days agoJulio
11 days agoLouann
19 days agoLetha
2 months agoKristel
11 days agoBrianne
18 days agoPansy
26 days agoTamesha
1 months agoAnnice
2 months agoMitsue
1 months agoAdaline
1 months agoGiovanna
2 months agoCasie
2 months agoCary
2 months agoMalcom
3 months ago