Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-134 Topic 1 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-134 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-134 Questions]

We find the JMSRedelivered header set for a particular message on the receiver.

In which two scenarios is this expected to happen? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tracey
2 months ago
Alright, let's see what we've got. A and B, that's the way to go. I mean, who hasn't forgotten to acknowledge a message or two? And the recover() method, classic. But the sender crashing? That's like something out of a sitcom. I wonder if they were trying to pull off some sort of message-sending epic fail.
upvoted 0 times
Kerrie
7 days ago
Julio: Haha, the sender crashing is like a plot twist in a comedy show.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 days ago
User 2: Totally, the recover() method is a lifesaver in those situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
19 days ago
User 1: Yeah, A and B make sense. Forgetting to acknowledge happens sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Letha
2 months ago
Hmm, the JMSRedelivered header, huh? I'm guessing options A and B are the winners here. I mean, who doesn't love a good session recovery story? Though the sender crashing has a certain comedic flair to it. Maybe they were just really tired of dealing with all these messages, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Kristel
11 days ago
The sender crashing does add a bit of drama to the whole message delivery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
18 days ago
I agree, it's all about session recovery and restarting after the last acknowledged message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
26 days ago
Yeah, it makes sense that the JMSRedelivered header would be set in those cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 months ago
I think you're right, options A and B seem like the most likely scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
2 months ago
Okay, let's see... The message wasn't acknowledged, that makes sense. And restarting the session with recover()? Yep, that'll do it. But the sender crashing? That's like the plot of a bad soap opera. I think I'll stick to option A and B, keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
1 months ago
User 2: Restarting the session seems like a logical reason too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
1 months ago
User 1: Yeah, not acknowledging the message can cause that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giovanna
2 months ago
Ah, the JMSRedelivered header, a telltale sign of some shenanigans! I'm pretty sure options A and B are the correct scenarios here. Calling recover() to restart the session? Classic move. Though I've gotta say, the sender crashing after sending the message is a real plot twist. Where's the drama, people?
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option C and D, they don't seem to be the expected scenarios for JMSRedelivered header to be set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
2 months ago
I agree with option B as well, if the session is restarted after the last acknowledged message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
3 months ago
I think option A is correct because the message was received but not acknowledged.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77