Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Oracle Exam 1Z0-133 Topic 15 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-133 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 15
[All 1Z0-133 Questions]

As the technical lead for your project, you have been asked to recommend a new solution to handle frequently increasing loads on your applications. The Weblogic 12.1.2 domain currently runs with two clusters of three servers with request being filtered and passed by a proxy server that users the round --robin algorithm.

However, the load sometimes exceeds the maximum capacity of all these servers combined but your domain lacks in scalability.

What is the best implementation solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by Temeka at Dec 08, 2024, 08:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-133 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shannon
7 days ago
Wait, why are we even considering a hardware load balancer? That's so 2005! Option C all the way, dynamic clusters are where it's at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
13 days ago
Option D, tuning work managers, sounds like a quick and easy fix. I bet that'll do the trick without all the hassle of reconfiguring the whole system.
upvoted 0 times
Jacquelyne
3 days ago
User 1: Option D, tuning work managers, sounds like a quick and easy fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tina
21 days ago
Hah, this is a classic IT problem - too much load and not enough scale. I'd go with Option C, it's the most future-proof solution that will grow with our needs.
upvoted 0 times
Julian
11 days ago
I agree, it's important to anticipate the number of server instances we'll need at peak load to ensure scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
14 days ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. Dynamic clusters will definitely help us handle the increasing load.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosamond
1 months ago
I disagree, I think Option E is the way to go. Replacing the software load balancer with a hardware one will provide more reliable and efficient load balancing, which is exactly what we need here.
upvoted 0 times
Leana
10 days ago
I think we should also consider Option C. Configuring dynamic clusters can help us anticipate and handle peak loads more effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
17 days ago
Option E is definitely a good choice. Hardware load balancers are known for their reliability and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
1 months ago
Option C sounds like the best solution to me. Dynamic clusters will allow the domain to scale up and down as needed, ensuring we can handle peak loads without wasting resources during off-peak times.
upvoted 0 times
Hana
6 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It's important to be able to handle peak loads efficiently without overloading the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
14 days ago
User 1: I think option C is the way to go. Dynamic clusters seem like they would really help with scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
1 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think dynamic clusters provide more flexibility in managing peak loads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option E is the way to go. Hardware load balancers are more reliable and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 months ago
I think option C is the best solution because it allows for scalability by dynamically adding server instances.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a