Wait, aren't encoder and decoder models used in things like machine translation? I think option D makes the most sense in that context. Gotta love the NLP jargon, though!
Haha, this question is giving me flashbacks to my machine learning class. All these encoder-decoder models start to blend together after a while. I'm just going to go with D and hope for the best.
Hmm, I was thinking option C was the right answer. Isn't that how most language models work, where the encoder predicts the next word and the decoder translates it back to text? But I could be wrong.
I see your point, but I believe option A is more accurate. Both encoder and decoder models convert words into vector representations without generating new text.
I agree with you, option D seems to make more sense. The encoder creates a vector representation, and the decoder uses it to generate a sequence of words.
I see your point, but I still believe option C is more accurate. The encoder predicts the next word, while the decoder converts the sequence into a numerical representation.
Okay, I think option D is the correct answer. The encoder model converts the sequence of words into a vector representation, and the decoder model then takes this vector representation and generates the sequence of words.
Yes, that's correct. The encoder model creates a vector representation of the input text, and the decoder model generates the output text based on that representation.
Lashawn
11 months agoSabina
11 months agoMartina
11 months agoCathrine
10 months agoLinn
10 months agoNoelia
10 months agoDeja
10 months agoNgoc
11 months agoDwight
11 months agoCandra
11 months agoJoesph
11 months agoLeatha
12 months agoLucina
12 months agoQuentin
11 months agoHubert
11 months agoJoni
12 months agoMozelle
12 months agoJoni
12 months ago