Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
PL
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ISC2
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Oracle Discussions
Exam 1Z0-1127-24 Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion
Oracle Exam 1Z0-1127-24 Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion
Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1127-24 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-1127-24 Questions]
Which is NOT a typical use case for LangSmith Evaluators?
A
Measuring coherence of generated text
B
Aliening code readability
C
Evaluating factual accuracy of outputs
D
Detecting bias or toxicity
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
D
by
Layla
at
Sep 14, 2024, 03:00 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium 1Z0-1127-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Aileen
6 months ago
Hmm, 'T-Few'? Is that like the diet version of T-Cell? I'll have to go with B, but I hope it doesn't come with any side effects.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kenny
6 months ago
Wait, is this about a new AI service or the latest fashion trend? I'm feeling option A - less is more, right?
upvoted
0
times
Yvonne
5 months ago
D) Foster training time and lower cost
upvoted
0
times
...
Hyman
5 months ago
A) Less is more, right?
upvoted
0
times
...
Vicky
5 months ago
B) Enhanced generalization to unseen data
upvoted
0
times
...
Rashad
6 months ago
A) Reduced model complexity
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Margart
7 months ago
Increased model interpretability? Finally, a feature that even I can understand. C gets my vote.
upvoted
0
times
Felton
6 months ago
I think C is the best choice for sure.
upvoted
0
times
...
Deangelo
6 months ago
Definitely, it makes it easier to understand how the model is making decisions.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lashawnda
6 months ago
I agree, having increased model interpretability is a game changer.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Joanne
7 months ago
Reduced model complexity, you say? Sounds like a fancy way of saying 'less baggage' to me. I'll go with D, save me some cash.
upvoted
0
times
Stevie
6 months ago
Yeah, I think I'll go with D too. Lower cost is always a plus.
upvoted
0
times
...
Josue
6 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the way to go. Saving money is always a good idea.
upvoted
0
times
...
Raylene
6 months ago
Reduced model complexity? That does sound like less baggage.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Yoko
7 months ago
But doesn't Vanilla fine-tuning offer enhanced generalization to unseen data?
upvoted
0
times
...
Von
8 months ago
I agree with Tyra, using T-Few can help simplify the model.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jacquelyne
8 months ago
T-Few, huh? Sounds like a hipster version of T-Rex. I'll go with B - gotta keep that data fresh, you know?
upvoted
0
times
Truman
7 months ago
Yeah, keeping the data fresh is important for sure.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tonette
8 months ago
T-Few does sound like a cool name. I think B is the way to go too.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Tyra
8 months ago
I think the key advantage is reduced model complexity.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
az-700
pass4success
az-104
200-301
200-201
cissp
350-401
350-201
350-501
350-601
350-801
350-901
az-720
az-305
pl-300
Aileen
6 months agoKenny
6 months agoYvonne
5 months agoHyman
5 months agoVicky
5 months agoRashad
6 months agoMargart
7 months agoFelton
6 months agoDeangelo
6 months agoLashawnda
6 months agoJoanne
7 months agoStevie
6 months agoJosue
6 months agoRaylene
6 months agoYoko
7 months agoVon
8 months agoJacquelyne
8 months agoTruman
7 months agoTonette
8 months agoTyra
8 months ago