Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1119-1 Topic 2 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1119-1 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-1119-1 Questions]

Which statement is true about IAM identity domains in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

OCI DevOps Code Repositories is a service designed to provide a secure, scalable, and collaborative environment for storing and managing source code. It offers an additional layer of security to control access, making it an ideal choice for storing sensitive configurations like Sunbird ED ansible inventory, ensuring that access to these configurations is tightly controlled and monitored.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Chara
1 months ago
Talk about identity crisis - these IAM identity domains sound like they need some serious therapy!
upvoted 0 times
Pete
8 days ago
D) They enable customers to partition an OCI tenancy into multiple identity domains, each with its own set of users, groups, and access policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
12 days ago
I know right, it's like they have multiple personalities!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
15 days ago
C) They enable customers to share user, group, and access policies between multiple OCI tenancies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
16 days ago
A) They enable customers to merge multiple OCI tenancies into a single identity domain, which can then be managed as a single unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Genevieve
1 months ago
I bet the exam writers threw in some real head-scratchers this time! Option A is just wild - merging multiple tenancies? That's got to be a trick question. Gotta keep my wits about me for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
1 months ago
Option B is tempting, but I don't think you can create a new tenancy that way. Sounds more like a feature for migrating from one tenancy to another. I'm going with D, seems the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
Alida
3 days ago
I agree, D seems like the most comprehensive solution for managing users, groups, and access policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
9 days ago
I think D is the best option too. It allows for partitioning an OCI tenancy into multiple identity domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desire
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C about sharing policies between tenancies sounds helpful, but I'm not convinced that's the whole story. Guess I'll have to study up on IAM identity domains a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Shay
18 days ago
Brett: I see your point. I'll have to look into it further to understand IAM identity domains better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
26 days ago
User 3: I agree with Merissa. Option A seems like the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
1 months ago
User 2: I'm not so sure. I think option A is the right answer. Merging multiple tenancies into a single identity domain sounds more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 months ago
User 1: I think option C is correct. Sharing policies between tenancies seems useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. Being able to partition an OCI tenancy into multiple identity domains with their own users, groups, and policies seems really useful for managing access in a complex environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
3 months ago
That makes sense too, sharing policies between tenancies could be very useful for managing access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C because it talks about sharing user, group, and access policies between multiple tenancies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
3 months ago
I think the answer is A because it mentions merging multiple tenancies into a single identity domain.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77