Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1075-24 Topic 6 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1075-24 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 6
[All 1Z0-1075-24 Questions]

A Manufacturing Engineer in a plant is creating an alternate manufacturing process for an item using its existing work definitions. After copying from the existing work definition, WD1, to the alternate work definition, WD2, the engineer finds that the operation items were not copied in the alternate manufacturing process WD2.

What is the reason for this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In Oracle Manufacturing Cloud, when performing a cost analysis using Cost Planning Scenarios, all components and resources involved in the assembly must be associated with the material cost plan to be included in the rolled-up cost estimates. The reason the extended costs of purchase components (P1 and P2) are not included in the rolled-up scenario is that:

Purchase components PI and P2 are not associated with the material cost plan of the Cost Planning Scenario. This means that although the components are defined in the system, they haven't been linked to the cost planning scenario, so their costs are not included in the rolled-up calculations.

Incorrect options:

Costs for purchase components PI and P2 are not defined in Cost Accounting (A): While defining costs is necessary, the issue here is the components not being associated with the cost plan.

Create Accounting (C) and Create Accounting Distributions (D) are not relevant to the rolled-up scenario in this context, as they relate to the accounting process, not cost planning.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ty
1 months ago
This is why we can't have nice things in manufacturing. Someone's always forgetting to check a box or two.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
13 hours ago
C) Item and Structure Name were changed in the new WD2 during creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
5 days ago
B) Item and Structure Name in the existing WD1 were retained in the new WD2 during creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
16 days ago
A) Production Priority was not populated in the new WD2 during creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to guess C. Changing the item and structure name would definitely cause the operation items to not copy over. That's my two cents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
2 months ago
I bet the engineer was trying to save time by skipping a few steps. Now they're probably wishing they had just done it right the first time.
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
3 days ago
A: True, it's important to double check all the details when creating a new work definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
5 days ago
B: Yeah, that could be it. Or maybe they accidentally changed the Item and Structure Name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
6 days ago
A: Maybe the engineer forgot to populate the Production Priority in the new WD2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
Ah, the joys of manufacturing processes! This is why we need more robots and fewer humans in this industry.
upvoted 0 times
Hoa
10 days ago
A: True, having robots handle these processes could prevent these kinds of errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
17 days ago
B: Maybe the Item and Structure Name in the existing WD1 were retained in the new WD2 during creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
19 days ago
A: The reason could be that Production Priority was not populated in the new WD2 during creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tequila
2 months ago
The engineer should have checked the settings during the copy process. Seems like a classic case of 'Garbage In, Garbage Out' to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
2 months ago
I agree with Reena, option A makes sense because without Production Priority, the operation items wouldn't be copied over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the reason is option C, Item and Structure Name were changed in the new WD2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
2 months ago
I think the reason is option A, Production Priority was not populated in the new WD2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77