Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1072-25 Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1072-25 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-1072-25 Questions]

Which compute capacity type would you select to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

On-demand capacity is the compute capacity type in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) that allows you to provision and use compute instances whenever needed, without any long-term commitment. This flexibility is ideal for various workloads, including development, testing, and production environments, where immediate availability and scalability are crucial.

Key Points:

On-Demand Capacity: On-demand compute instances provide users with the flexibility to spin up instances as required and only pay for the time the instances are running. This model is most suitable for workloads with unpredictable usage patterns or short-term requirements.

Flexibility and Scalability: With on-demand capacity, you can quickly scale your resources up or down based on your application's needs, ensuring that you only pay for the resources you actually use.

No Commitment: Unlike reserved capacity, on-demand capacity does not require any long-term commitment or upfront payment, making it an attractive option for organizations looking to avoid capital expenditures.


Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Documentation: OCI Compute Pricing

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Documentation: Compute Instance Lifecycle

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

A . Capacity reservation: This option allows you to reserve capacity in advance, ensuring that resources are available when needed. It's ideal for predictable workloads but may not be as cost-effective for fluctuating demands.

B . Preemptible capacity: Preemptible instances are a lower-cost option where instances can be terminated by OCI if resources are needed elsewhere. This is suitable for non-critical workloads that can tolerate interruptions.

D . Dedicated host: Dedicated hosts provide physical servers for your exclusive use, offering isolation and predictable performance. This option is more suitable for workloads requiring dedicated resources or compliance needs.

Thus, Option C: On-demand capacity is the correct choice for most general-purpose workloads needing flexibility and immediate availability without long-term commitment.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Artie
17 days ago
I prefer preemptible capacity for cost savings, as long as the workload can tolerate interruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
18 days ago
I bet the exam writer is having a laugh at our expense with these options. What, no 'Magical Cloud Unicorn' option?
upvoted 0 times
Phil
2 days ago
A) Capacity reservation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lacresha
23 days ago
I would choose dedicated host for better control over the resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tora
23 days ago
Option C, On-demand capacity, seems like the most flexible choice to me. I can scale up or down as needed.
upvoted 0 times
Josphine
3 hours ago
Preemptible capacity might be cost-effective for certain use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
4 days ago
I think Capacity reservation could be a good option for predictable workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
10 days ago
I agree, On-demand capacity allows for flexibility in scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I might need to go with Option D, Dedicated Host, to get the performance and reliability I require.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
1 months ago
I agree with Lenna, on-demand capacity seems like the most flexible option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
1 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Preemptible capacity sounds like it could be a cost-effective solution for my needs.
upvoted 0 times
Nobuko
5 days ago
Dedicated host might be a good choice if you require full control over the physical server for security reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
7 days ago
I would go with on-demand capacity for more flexibility in scaling up or down based on my needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
27 days ago
I agree, preemptible capacity can be a cost-effective option for certain workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
1 months ago
I think for these requirements, I would go with on-demand capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77