Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1054-24 Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1054-24 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-1054-24 Questions]

You have three ledgers that use the same chart of accounts with one intercompany payable and one intercompany receivable account. The chart of accounts also has an intercompany segment. Each ledger has one legal entity assigned to it and each legal entity is associated with one balancing segment value.

At what level should you define the default intercompany balancing rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

You should define the default intercompany balancing rule at the legal entity level, because each ledger has one legal entity assigned to it and each legal entity is associated with one balancing segment value. This way, you can specify the intercompany receivables and payables accounts for each legal entity and ensure that the journals are balanced by legal entity or primary balancing segment values. A ledger-level rule would apply to all legal entities in the ledger, which may not be appropriate if they have different intercompany accounts. A primary balancing segment rule would apply to all ledgers that share the same chart of accounts, which may not be desirable if they have different intercompany rules. A chart of accounts rule would apply to all ledgers and legal entities that use the same chart of accounts, which may not be feasible if they have different intercompany segments or accounts.Reference:

Intercompany Balancing Rules, Section: Define Intercompany Balancing Rules

Overview of Intercompany Balancing Rules, Section: Define Intercompany Balancing Rules

Troubleshooting Guide For Intercompany Balancing, Section: 1. Journals and subledger accounting entries are not being balanced for intercompany activity

Implement General Ledger, Section: Intercompany Balancing


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ledger-level rule? No way, that's way too specific. We need something that can handle all the ledgers consistently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
22 hours ago
Haha, I bet the answer is 'D) Chart of accounts rule' because that's the most comprehensive option. Gotta love those tricky accounting questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
12 days ago
Primary balancing segment rule seems like the way to go. It would keep the intercompany balancing consistent across the different legal entities.
upvoted 0 times
Matthew
3 days ago
B) Legal entity-level rule
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
8 days ago
A) Ledger-level rule
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincent
16 days ago
I think defining the default intercompany balancing rule at the chart of accounts lVincentl would provide the most flexibility and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
17 days ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to have it at the ledger level to ensure consistency across all ledgers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
28 days ago
I disagree, I believe it should be defined at the primary balancing segment level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
1 months ago
I think the default intercompany balancing rule should be defined at the legal entity level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
1 months ago
Chart of accounts rule sounds good to me. That way, the intercompany balancing can be managed centrally across all the ledgers.
upvoted 0 times
Vonda
4 days ago
Chart of accounts rule sounds good to me. That way, the intercompany balancing can be managed centrally across all the ledgers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
8 days ago
D) Chart of accounts rule
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
12 days ago
C) Primary balancing segment rule
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
1 months ago
B) Legal entity-level rule
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
1 months ago
A) Ledger-level rule
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dong
1 months ago
I think the default intercompany balancing rule should be defined at the legal entity-level. That way, it can be easily applied to all ledgers associated with the same legal entity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77