Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1050-24 Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1050-24 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-1050-24 Questions]

A court has issued an order for deductions to be taken from a worker's salary and paid to an ex-spouse. The court order includes instructions for the company to make payments directly to the ex-spouse and has included their bank details. How should you enter these details into the application?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, court-ordered deductions (e.g., for an ex-spouse) are managed as third-party payments. The correct method is to enter the ex-spouse's bank details on the 'Manage Third-Party Person Payment Methods' page, which is designed for payments to individuals outside the organization, such as garnishments or alimony. Option A is incorrect, as Cloud Payroll supports direct payments to third-party persons, not just courts. Option B (personal payment methods) applies to the worker's own payments, not third parties, and Option C (third-party organization) is for entities, not individuals. This process is outlined in the 'Third-Party Payments' section.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cyril
11 days ago
This is just another day in the life of a payroll professional, am I right? Gotta love when the court gets involved and makes our jobs even more interesting. But hey, at least we get to play treasure hunt with the ex-spouse's bank details, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
12 days ago
I dunno, man. Option A sounds like the payroll equivalent of a 'get out of jail free' card. Just tell 'em the system can't handle it and let the court deal with it. Genius!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
17 days ago
I believe option C could work as well, as long as we ensure the payments are made to the ex-spouse as instructed by the court.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
20 days ago
But what if the option D is not available in the application? Should we consider option C instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
23 days ago
Hey, at least the court is being specific with the instructions. Saves us the headache of having to figure it all out on our own. Option B seems like the easiest route to me.
upvoted 0 times
Aleshia
3 hours ago
Option B seems like the easiest route to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
25 days ago
I agree with Zona, it makes sense to follow the court order and enter the details there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
29 days ago
I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Keeping the ex-spouse's details on a separate page seems like the best way to avoid any messy mix-ups. Wouldn't want to accidentally send their money to the wrong place, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Queenie
10 days ago
Definitely, we don't want any mix-ups when it comes to sending payments to the ex-spouse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
15 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It's better to have a separate page for the ex-spouse's details to avoid any confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
16 days ago
I think C is the best option too. It's important to keep everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannine
1 months ago
Option D sounds like the way to go. Gotta keep those ex-spouse payments on lock, you know? No mixing up the personal and professional stuff.
upvoted 0 times
Pearline
12 days ago
User 3: Agreed, better to follow the court order correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
19 days ago
User 2: Yeah, definitely. It's important to keep things separate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
23 days ago
User 1: Option D sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
1 months ago
I think we should enter the bank details on the manage third-party person payment methods page.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77