Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1047-24 Topic 4 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1047-24 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-1047-24 Questions]

You configure a Holiday absence type with the "Insufficient Balance Enforcement" rule set to Not Enabled for administrative transactions and you associate it with an absence plan that has "Allow Negative Balance?" set to No.

What is the outcome if an administrator submits a holiday with an absence type duration of 15 days for an employee who has only 10 days of balance left?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Starr
9 days ago
Ah, the age-old question of 'what happens when you break the rules?' I'm gonna go with D, just because it sounds the most bureaucratic and, you know, 'IT-ish.'
upvoted 0 times
...
An
12 days ago
This is a classic case of 'it depends.' If the system is designed to be more lenient, then B could be the right answer. But if it's more strict, then C or D might be the way to go. I'm going to go with C, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
14 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also be a possible outcome since the absence plan does not allow negative balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
17 days ago
I agree with Theodora, option A seems like the correct outcome based on the configuration settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
19 days ago
Okay, let's think this through. The 'Insufficient Balance Enforcement' rule is not enabled, but the plan doesn't allow negative balances. I'd guess that the system will just take the 10 days available and let the rest error out. So, B is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Edda
2 days ago
Yeah, I agree. The system should deduct the 10 days and let the rest error out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
7 days ago
I think you're right, option B seems to be the most logical outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathern
19 days ago
Hmm, this is tricky. If the 'Insufficient Balance Enforcement' rule is not enabled, then the absence should go through, right? But the plan doesn't allow negative balances, so I'm not sure how that works. C seems like the most likely option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
21 days ago
I think the absence will error out with the message about insufficient balance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77