Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-084 Topic 10 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-084 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 10
[All 1Z0-084 Questions]

Which three statements are true about using the in Memory (IM) column store?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

Regarding space usage in temporary tablespaces, the following statements are true:

A (Correct): When a global temporary table or a sort operation exceeds the available memory, Oracle Database allocates space in a temporary tablespace to store the temporary data or intermediate results.

E (Correct): Using temporary tablespace groups can prevent insufficient temporary tablespace for sort operations by providing a collective pool of space from multiple temporary tablespaces, which can be used for user sorting operations.

The other options provided have inaccuracies:

B (Incorrect): Oracle does not provide a mechanism for setting quotas on temporary tablespaces. Quotas can be set for permanent tablespaces but not for temporary ones.

C (Incorrect): A sort operation may fail due to insufficient space, but Oracle will attempt to allocate space in the temporary tablespace dynamically. If no space can be allocated, an error is returned rather than a sort failure.

D (Incorrect): If a session consumes all available temporary tablespace storage, Oracle will not hang the session; it will return an error to the session indicating that it has run out of temporary space.


Oracle Database Administrator's Guide: Managing Space for Schema Objects

Oracle Database Concepts: Temporary Tablespaces

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacki
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure F is true. The IM column store is great for joining multiple tables, especially with those fancy bloom filters. Oh, and C is true too - no more indexes, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
13 days ago
I agree, F is definitely true. Bloom filter joins are a game changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dean
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is the one that mentions 'bloom filter joins'. That's gotta be the tricky one to catch us out!
upvoted 0 times
Danica
9 days ago
User 3: I agree, F seems like the correct answer to me as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
29 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds right. I'll go with F too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
1 months ago
User 1: I think the correct answer is F, it improves performance for queries using bloom filter joins.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ozell
2 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. Isn't C true too? The IM column store can improve OLTP performance by avoiding indexes, right?
upvoted 0 times
Noel
17 days ago
C) It can improve OLTP workload performance by avoiding the use of indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
24 days ago
B) It does not improve performance for queries that use join groups on columns from different tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
1 months ago
A) It does not improve performance for queries using cached results of function evaluations on columns from the same table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
2 months ago
I'm not sure about statement E. Does the IM column store really not require all database data to fit in memory to improve query performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 months ago
I think A, B, and E are true. The IM column store doesn't improve performance for cached functions or joins, but it doesn't require all data to fit in memory.
upvoted 0 times
Henriette
1 months ago
Yes, those are the correct statements about using the IM column store.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
2 months ago
I agree, A, B, and E are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
I agree with Delmy. Statement C makes sense because indexes can slow down OLTP workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
3 months ago
I think statement C is true because IM column store can improve OLTP workload performance by avoiding the use of indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77