Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm going to go with Options A and C, as they seem the most straightforward. The other options sound a bit too complicated to be true.
This question is tricky! I'm pretty sure Option F is correct, as duplexing would definitely require twice the number of channels. But the other options are a bit unclear to me.
Option A seems logical, as duplexing would require additional channels. However, I'm not sure about the other options, especially the ones involving disk and tape duplexing.
I'm not sure about option F. I think option C is true because a non-duplexed backup set written to SBT can be duplexed to tape by backing up the backup set that is already on tape.
I agree with you, Noelia. Option F is also true because a duplexed backup set always uses twice as many SBT channels as a non-duplexed backup set for the same number of files.
Markus
29 days agoMartin
8 days agoLeanna
12 days agoJoye
1 months agoOna
12 days agoHarley
18 days agoHortencia
1 months agoMari
8 days agoJenise
21 days agoLauran
2 months agoBuddy
11 days agoBrent
17 days agoSalome
1 months agoPrincess
2 months agoJovita
12 days agoWhitley
17 days agoLeota
20 days agoNickolas
27 days agoReena
1 months agoClement
1 months agoSharika
2 months agoToshia
2 months agoTonette
2 months agoRoselle
3 months agoWillow
3 months agoRenea
3 months agoNoelia
3 months ago