Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-076 Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-076 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-076 Questions]

A customer asks for your recommendation regarding this requirement:

1. We plan to have a Data Guard Configuration with one primary database and one physical standby database.

2. We want zero data loss in case of a disaster involving the loss of one component.

3. We want to do Real Application Testing occasionally on the Standby Database.

Which solution, if any, satisfies these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D, E

After a successful failover to the 'cats' database in a Data Guard configuration:

B: Sheep, being another standby database, would typically remain in the enabled state unless specifically disabled or if there was a configuration issue.

D: Dogs, which was the primary database prior to failover, will be in a disabled state as part of the failover process. Manual intervention is required to re-establish 'dogs' as a standby database or to return it to the primary role through another role transition.

E: If the configuration was in Maximum Availability mode before failover, it would remain in this mode after failover, provided all settings were properly configured and no changes were made to the protection mode.

Option A is incorrect because failover does not automatically change the protection mode to Maximum Performance. The protection mode remains as it was prior to the failover unless manually altered.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Trinidad
1 months ago
Wait, so they want zero data loss but also want to do real application testing on the standby? Sounds like they're trying to have their cake and eat it too. Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
Carmela
16 days ago
B) A physical standby database with synchronous redo transport that can be converted regularly into a snapshot standby to do real application testing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronny
1 months ago
Haha, 'These requirements cannot be met'? That's a bold move, Candidate A. I wonder if they're just trying to be funny or if they actually think it's impossible.
upvoted 0 times
Kimberely
18 days ago
A: I think option B could work for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
2 months ago
I don't know, Option D looks pretty interesting too. A far sync instance plus a snapshot standby sounds like it could provide the flexibility they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Lanie
17 days ago
Option D might be too complex for their needs. Option B or C would be more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
26 days ago
I think Option C could also work since it allows for real time query on the standby database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
1 months ago
I agree, Option B provides the necessary flexibility for their requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice. It allows for real application testing on the standby database.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catherin
2 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice here. Synchronous redo transport ensures zero data loss, and the ability to convert to a snapshot standby for testing is a nice feature.
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
1 months ago
I agree, Option B covers all the requirements effectively. It's a good recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice here. Synchronous redo transport ensures zero data loss, and the ability to convert to a snapshot standby for testing is a nice feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karl
2 months ago
Option C allows for real time query and can be converted into a physical standby database for testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
2 months ago
Why do you think option C is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
3 months ago
I think option B could work for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77