Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Topic 6 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 6
[All OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

In the model shown below, what is gained by using the Extend relationship?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The image showcases a state machine named 'BehaviorA'. It consists of two states: s1 and s2. There's also a transition labeled 'signalA' connecting these states. However, a guard condition, '[x > 0]' is placed on the transition. This indicates that the signalA event will only trigger the transition if the expression x > 0 evaluates to true.

In the scenario you described, the state machine is currently in state s1, and the value of x is 0. Since the guard condition '[x > 0]' is not satisfied (because x is 0), the signalA event will not trigger a transition to state s2.

Here's a breakdown of why other options are incorrect:

Option A (The state machine will transition to state s2 and execute ActivityA during the transition) is not valid because the guard condition prevents the transition.

Option B (The state machine will execute ActivityA and remain in state s1) is incorrect as ActivityA is only associated with the transition, which isn't happening in this case.

Option D (The state machine will remain in state s1, and processing of the signalA event occurrence will be deferred until either the value of x changes or the state machine changes state) is not entirely accurate. While the state machine remains in s1, the processing of the signalA event is consumed immediately, not deferred.

Therefore, considering the state machine's visual representation and the guard condition, option C best describes the state machine's behavior. The signalA event is acknowledged but has no effect because the transition requirements aren't met.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Trina
29 days ago
I'm just hoping I don't accidentally 'Extend' my patience while trying to figure out the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer had a field day coming up with these answer choices. They're really making us think about the nuances of use case relationships.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
7 days ago
A) The Extend relationships avoid the need for behavior descriptions such as Activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
1 months ago
Hmm, the Extend relationship is supposed to be for optional functionality, not for functional decomposition. I'm not sure I agree with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 months ago
Wow, this question really gets to the heart of how Extend relationships work in use case modeling. I like how the options explore the different benefits.
upvoted 0 times
Oneida
2 days ago
C) This Use Case model could be updated with further payment methods without changing the main Use Cases 'Book a car' and 'Charge account'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
15 days ago
C) This Use Case model could be updated with further payment methods without changing the main Use Cases 'Book a car' and 'Charge account'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
15 days ago
B) The Extend relationship is used here to perform a functional decomposition of the Use case behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
16 days ago
B) The Extend relationship is used here to perform a functional decomposition of the Use case behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 months ago
A) The Extend relationships avoid the need for behavior descriptions such as Activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
2 months ago
A) The Extend relationships avoid the need for behavior descriptions such as Activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moon
2 months ago
But D makes sense because it helps avoid redundant descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
2 months ago
The Extend relationship seems to be used here to avoid redundant behavior descriptions in the sub-use cases. That makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
Arlyne
2 months ago
C) This Use Case model could be updated with further payment methods without changing the main Use Cases 'Book a car' and 'Charge account'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
2 months ago
A) The Extend relationships avoid the need for behavior descriptions such as Activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hildred
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but D also sounds plausible with the taxonomic relationship explanation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
2 months ago
I agree with Hester, C makes sense because it allows for updates without changing main Use Cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77