Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
[All OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

Consider the following diagram:

Which statement is always true about this diagram?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The image showcases a state machine named 'BehaviorA'. It consists of two states: s1 and s2. There's also a transition labeled 'signalA' connecting these states. However, a guard condition, '[x > 0]' is placed on the transition. This indicates that the signalA event will only trigger the transition if the expression x > 0 evaluates to true.

In the scenario you described, the state machine is currently in state s1, and the value of x is 0. Since the guard condition '[x > 0]' is not satisfied (because x is 0), the signalA event will not trigger a transition to state s2.

Here's a breakdown of why other options are incorrect:

Option A (The state machine will transition to state s2 and execute ActivityA during the transition) is not valid because the guard condition prevents the transition.

Option B (The state machine will execute ActivityA and remain in state s1) is incorrect as ActivityA is only associated with the transition, which isn't happening in this case.

Option D (The state machine will remain in state s1, and processing of the signalA event occurrence will be deferred until either the value of x changes or the state machine changes state) is not entirely accurate. While the state machine remains in s1, the processing of the signalA event is consumed immediately, not deferred.

Therefore, considering the state machine's visual representation and the guard condition, option C best describes the state machine's behavior. The signalA event is acknowledged but has no effect because the transition requirements aren't met.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Melita
2 months ago
Ah, the old 'no H object associated with G' trick. Classic UML trickery, I'm onto you, option D!
upvoted 0 times
Ludivina
22 days ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but I think option B could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
24 days ago
User 2: Really? I was leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
1 months ago
User 1: I think option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
2 months ago
Infinitely many H objects? Sounds like a bug waiting to happen. I'll steer clear of option A, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
2 months ago
I'm feeling adventurous today, let's go with option B! Between 1 and 5 G objects, what could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
2 months ago
Option C seems like the safest bet here. Gotta love those 'fewer than 5' statements, they're always a safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
Chandra
1 months ago
Yeah, I think so too. 'Fewer than 5' just sounds more reliable in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
2 months ago
I agree, option C does seem like the safest choice. It's always good to go with the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlyn
2 months ago
Hmm, this diagram looks like it's trying to confuse me. I'll go with option D - it's the only one that doesn't make any bold claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
2 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77