OMG Exam OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Topic 5 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 5

Choose the correct answer:

A modeler wants to develop a customization for a standard UML tool that provides the ability to specify CORBA physical Components.

Which approach should the modeler use?

ACreate a profile for the CORBA component technologies and apply it to the model.

BCreate a MOF metamodel for the CORBA component technology and add It to the UML metamodel.

CCreate CORBA component instances that can be used as Parts in a composite structure compartment.

DCreate a set of execution semantic definitions for the CORBA component assembly Connectors and apply them to the model.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

In fUML (Foundational UML), an execution model must be modeled as an Activity.fUML is a subset of UML that includes the ability to model behavior using UML activities, which are composed of a rich set of primitive actions1.Activities in fUML represent the executable aspects of a model and define the flow of control and data2. They are the primary means for specifying the detailed procedural logic of the behavior of a system within fUML.

by Hubert at Jun 24, 2024, 10:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tonette

1 months ago

I bet the modeler is wishing they had a 'create CORBA component with a single click' feature. That would really streamline the process.

upvoted 0 times

Yuki

5 days ago

B) Create a MOF metamodel for the CORBA component technology and add it to the UML metamodel.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hana

24 days ago

A) Create a profile for the CORBA component technologies and apply it to the model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

2 months ago

Option D is a bit too complex for my liking. Defining execution semantics for CORBA connectors? That's overkill, in my opinion.

upvoted 0 times

Glenn

23 days ago

C: Yeah, creating a profile for the CORBA component technologies sounds like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

1 months ago

B: I think option A might be a simpler and more practical approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myra

1 months ago

A: I agree, option D does seem like a lot of unnecessary work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

2 months ago

Hold up, what about Option C? Creating CORBA component instances as parts in a composite structure? That's an interesting approach, definitely worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

Zena

3 days ago

User 4: User Comment: Hold up, what about Option C? Creating CORBA component instances as parts in a composite structure? That's an interesting approach, definitely worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

13 days ago

User 3: Option C) Create CORBA component instances that can be used as parts in a composite structure compartment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

18 days ago

User 2: Option B) Create a MOF metamodel for the CORBA component technology and add it to the UML metamodel.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tuyet

1 months ago

User 2: I agree, using CORBA component instances as parts in a composite structure could be a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adrianna

1 months ago

User 1: Option A) Create a profile for the CORBA component technologies and apply it to the model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Howard

2 months ago

User 1: Option C does sound like a viable approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherly

2 months ago

I'm not sure about that. Option B sounds more robust - creating a MOF metamodel and integrating it with the UML metamodel could provide a more comprehensive solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Davida

2 months ago

Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Creating a CORBA profile for the UML tool is the most straightforward way to extend the modeling capabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...