Hold on, why aren't there any options for the rate being a constant value? That would be my pick, but I guess the exam writers wanted to make this more complicated.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option F - an upper bound on the number of objects traversing the edge. Seems more realistic than expecting an exact number.
I'm leaning towards Option C. The rate should represent the expected number of changes to an object's value, not the number of objects traversing the edge.
Option D seems the most logical choice here. The rate on an activity edge should specify the expected number of objects traversing the edge per time interval.
Benton
29 days agoMichael
15 days agoSylvie
17 days agoMike
17 days agoGail
1 months agoFallon
12 days agoRodney
19 days agoKanisha
23 days agoJules
2 months agoRenea
10 days agoGraciela
14 days agoJill
17 days agoRolland
19 days agoTegan
1 months agoBrendan
1 months agoRusty
1 months agoPaola
2 months agoLisandra
2 months agoXochitl
1 months agoCraig
2 months agoLaticia
2 months agoMammie
2 months agoDetra
2 months agoCeleste
2 months agoCristal
3 months agoCeleste
3 months ago