Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 1
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer

What does a rate applied to an activity edge specify?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Benton
29 days ago
If you get stumped, just start randomly bubbling in answers. That's how I aced my driver's license test!
upvoted 0 times
Michael
15 days ago
I believe it's A) a lower bound on the number of changes to an object's value per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
17 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D) the expected number of objects that traverse the edge per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
17 days ago
I think the correct answer is C) the expected number of changes to an object's value per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
1 months ago
Hold on, why aren't there any options for the rate being a constant value? That would be my pick, but I guess the exam writers wanted to make this more complicated.
upvoted 0 times
Fallon
12 days ago
User 3: Maybe it's an upper bound on the number of changes to an object's value per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
19 days ago
User 2: I believe it's actually the expected number of objects that traverse the edge per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
23 days ago
User 1: I think the rate applied to an activity edge specifies the expected number of changes to an object's value per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jules
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with Option F - an upper bound on the number of objects traversing the edge. Seems more realistic than expecting an exact number.
upvoted 0 times
Renea
10 days ago
User4: I think it's option A - a lower bound on the number of changes to an object's value per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
14 days ago
User 3: I agree, it allows for some flexibility in the estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
17 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it makes sense to have an upper bound rather than an exact number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
19 days ago
User3: I'm not sure, but I'll go with option F - an upper bound on the number of objects that will traverse the edge per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 months ago
User 1: I think it's Option F too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
1 months ago
User2: I disagree, I believe it's option D - the expected number of objects that traverse the edge per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
1 months ago
User1: I think it's option C - the expected number of changes to an object's value per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paola
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. The rate should represent the expected number of changes to an object's value, not the number of objects traversing the edge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
2 months ago
Option D seems the most logical choice here. The rate on an activity edge should specify the expected number of objects traversing the edge per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
Xochitl
1 months ago
Yes, I agree. Option D is the most logical choice for the rate applied to an activity edge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
2 months ago
I think option D is correct. It specifies the expected number of objects that traverse the edge per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laticia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D. Can someone explain why C is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 months ago
I agree with Detra, because the rate applied to an activity edge specifies the expected number of changes to an object's value per time interval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
2 months ago
Why do you think it's D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
3 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77