Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer.

Given the following diagram fragment:

What does the multiplicity at the actor end mean?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mertie
27 days ago
Multiplicity on a use case diagram? I thought that was only for class diagrams. *laughs* Well, I'm going to go with C, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
28 days ago
Two Initiator actors? That's like a buddy cop movie waiting to happen. *chuckles* Anyway, I think option C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
29 days ago
Wait, so multiplicities actually have meaning on use case diagrams? I thought they were just for class diagrams. This is news to me. *scratches head* Guess I'll have to go with C, since it seems the most logical.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
4 days ago
User2: Yeah, I was surprised to learn they have meaning on use case diagrams as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
8 days ago
User1: I always thought multiplicities were only for class diagrams too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juan
1 months ago
Aha! I remember learning about this in class. The multiplicity shows the number of actors required to participate in the use case. Option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
1 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The options are a bit confusing. I think I'll just go with option D, since I'm not entirely confident in my understanding of multiplicities on use case diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
13 hours ago
User3: I'm not sure, but I'll go with option C) Two Initiator actor instances are required to participate in the use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 days ago
User2: I agree with User1, option A seems to be the most logical choice
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
2 days ago
User1: I think the correct answer is A) At most two Initiator actor instances can perform the use case
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
8 days ago
Alright, option D it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
14 days ago
I agree, let's go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
1 months ago
I think option D is a safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilbert
2 months ago
But I'm not sure, maybe D is also a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 months ago
I believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
2 months ago
Hmm, the multiplicity at the actor end seems to indicate the number of actors required for the use case. I'm going to go with option C, since it makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Adela
1 months ago
Actually, I think you're right. Option C does make more sense now that I think about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option C is the best answer. It says two Initiator actor instances are required to participate in the use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the right choice. It states that two Initiator actor instances are required to trigger the use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
1 months ago
I think option A is correct. It means at most two Initiator actor instances can perform the use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilbert
2 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77