[Prompt Engineering]
When designing prompts for a large language model to perform a complex reasoning task, such as solving a multi-step mathematical problem, which advanced prompt engineering technique is most effective in ensuring robust performance across diverse inputs?
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting is an advanced prompt engineering technique that significantly enhances a large language model's (LLM) performance on complex reasoning tasks, such as multi-step mathematical problems. By including examples that explicitly demonstrate step-by-step reasoning in the prompt, CoT guides the model to break down the problem into intermediate steps, improving accuracy and robustness. NVIDIA's NeMo documentation on prompt engineering highlights CoT as a powerful method for tasks requiring logical or sequential reasoning, as it leverages the model's ability to mimic structured problem-solving. Research by Wei et al. (2022) demonstrates that CoT outperforms other methods for mathematical reasoning. Option A (zero-shot) is less effective for complex tasks due to lack of guidance. Option B (few-shot with random examples) is suboptimal without structured reasoning. Option D (RAG) is useful for factual queries but less relevant for pure reasoning tasks.
NVIDIA NeMo Documentation: https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/nemo/user-guide/docs/en/stable/nlp/intro.html
Wei, J., et al. (2022). 'Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models.'
Ivory
1 days agoDanica
3 days agoLino
5 days ago