Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCS-Core Topic 1 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCS-Core exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 1
[All NCS-Core Questions]

An administrator has two clusters: Site A and Site B.

Async DR is configured between the clusters as follows:

* Site A is the Primary Site

* Site B is the Secondary inactive Site, no VMs running

* Site A is fully in Production

* Site B used as Backup/Disaster Recovery

The customer wants to perform a planned failover between the sites.

How should the administrator accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Millie
27 days ago
Ugh, these questions always make me overthink things. I'm just gonna go with my gut and choose option C. Migrate sounds like the right move for a planned failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
29 days ago
Haha, this is a classic IT exam question. They're really trying to trip us up with the wording. I'm going with option D, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 months ago
Wait, isn't the 'Activate' option meant for emergency situations? I'm leaning towards option C, 'Migrate', as it sounds more like a planned failover.
upvoted 0 times
Linn
6 days ago
I think 'Activate' is more for emergency situations, so 'Migrate' makes sense for a planned failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
10 days ago
I agree, 'Migrate' seems like the right option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
18 days ago
Option C sounds like the best choice for a planned failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
Hmm, the question seems straightforward. I think option B is the way to go, since we want to activate the Secondary site and deactivate the Primary site.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
1 months ago
I see your point. It's important to ensure a smooth transition during the failover process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
1 months ago
That's a good point. Choosing Migrate on the Secondary site might be a safer approach for the planned failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 months ago
But wouldn't it be safer to choose Migrate on the Secondary site instead of deactivating the Primary site directly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
1 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. We need to activate the Secondary site and deactivate the Primary site.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
An
2 months ago
But why do you think that? Can you explain your rationale?
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct way to accomplish the planned failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 months ago
I think the administrator should choose option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77