Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix Exam NCS-Core Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCS-Core exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 1
[All NCS-Core Questions]

An administrator needs to make sure an RF3 cluster can survive a failure of two complete racks without negatively affecting performance. The current cluster configuration consists of the following:

* 30 All Flash Nodes: distributed 10 nodes per rack across three 42U racks

* Each node is configured with 20TB usable storage all flash (Cluster Total 600TB Usable)

* Current cluster utilization is 500TB storage

* Storage containers have Erasure Coding enabled

Which configuration changes should be made to make sure the cluster meets the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Venita at Jan 28, 2024, 05:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCS-Core Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Clement
2 days ago
Wow, this is a real brain-teaser! I bet the answer involves some complex calculations around rack redundancy and storage utilization. I'm just hoping I don't end up with a cluster that's too big to fit in my living room.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
4 days ago
40 nodes across 5 racks? I don't think that's going to cut it. We need more nodes to handle the loss of two racks. I'm leaning towards the 50 nodes across 5 racks solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
12 days ago
60 nodes across 6 racks? That sounds a bit overkill. I'd go with the 50 nodes across 5 racks option - it should give us the redundancy we need without going overboard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
15 days ago
Okay, so we need to make sure the cluster can handle the loss of two racks. Expanding to 48 nodes across 6 racks seems like a solid solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
18 days ago
Hmm, the current cluster has 30 nodes across 3 racks, and the question says the requirement is to survive two complete rack failures. I think expanding to 50 nodes across 5 racks would be the best way to meet that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Casie
13 days ago
I think option A is the best choice to ensure the cluster can withstand the failure of two complete racks without performance impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
14 days ago
I agree, expanding to 50 nodes across 5 racks would provide the redundancy needed to survive two complete rack failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
1 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. Wouldn't expanding to 50 nodes across 5 racks be enough to meet the requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
1 months ago
I agree with Jamal. With 60 nodes across 6 racks, we can ensure the cluster can survive a failure of two complete racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a