A customer needs a 20-node cluster built. The consultant only has a 16-port flat network switch, and the customer is using VLAN tagging for the hosts and CVMs.
D is the only way to go. Anything else would be like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Gotta work with the resources you have, not the ones you wish you had.
Haha, I can't imagine trying to fit a 20-node cluster on a 16-port switch. Option D is the clear winner. Might as well throw a hammer at the problem if you go with any other choice.
I'm going with D. Building a separate four-node cluster is the only logical choice here. Trying to force a 20-node cluster on a 16-port switch is just asking for trouble.
Shawnta
2 months agoTequila
11 days agoArlene
14 days agoSean
17 days agoClare
1 months agoLewis
2 months agoJeannetta
2 months agoValentine
2 months agoBonita
2 months agoOwen
2 months agoMabelle
2 months agoHoa
2 months agoCherilyn
2 months agoSunshine
15 days agoRodney
19 days agoAmina
1 months agoKris
1 months agoBonita
2 months ago