A customer needs a 20-node cluster built. The consultant only has a 16-port flat network switch, and the customer is using VLAN tagging for the hosts and CVMs.
D is the only way to go. Anything else would be like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Gotta work with the resources you have, not the ones you wish you had.
Haha, I can't imagine trying to fit a 20-node cluster on a 16-port switch. Option D is the clear winner. Might as well throw a hammer at the problem if you go with any other choice.
I'm going with D. Building a separate four-node cluster is the only logical choice here. Trying to force a 20-node cluster on a 16-port switch is just asking for trouble.
Shawnta
2 days agoLewis
9 days agoBonita
11 days agoOwen
11 days agoMabelle
12 days agoHoa
13 days agoCherilyn
15 days agoBonita
18 days ago