A customer with a four-node RF2 cluster is adding application VMs to their system. After adding these VMs, the Prism dashboard shows 81% storage utilization.
What is the consequence of running the cluster at 81% storage utilization?
Hold up, are we talking about a four-node cluster or a four-legged chicken? Either way, 81% storage utilization is no joke. I'd have to go with C - that node failure is gonna be as inevitable as a bad pun from the guy next to me.
Hmm, 81% huh? Sounds like the customer needs to start downsizing their VM collection before they end up with a storage disaster on their hands. I'd go with D on this one - the cluster is definitely not resilient enough to handle that kind of load.
81% storage utilization? That's cutting it close! Better start looking for a new cluster before the whole thing comes crashing down. I'm thinking option C is the way to go - node failure is just around the corner.
Rozella
9 hours agoOlen
9 days agoEllen
12 days agoVernell
13 days agoHerminia
15 days agoDerick
22 days ago