Nutanix Exam NCS-Core Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCS-Core exam

Question #: 42
Topic #: 1

A customer with a four-node RF2 cluster is adding application VMs to their system. After adding these VMs, the Prism dashboard shows 81% storage utilization.

What is the consequence of running the cluster at 81% storage utilization?

AThe customer has the ability to add more VMs up to the 100% storage utilization.

BThere is available capacity in the storage fabric and the cluster is resilient.

CNode failure is imminent due to storage utilization.

DThe cluster is not resilient in the storage fabric

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Ezekiel at Jul 29, 2023, 04:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCS-Core Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Allene

2 months ago

Whoa, 81% utilization? That's like trying to stuff a hippo into a shoebox. I'm gonna have to go with option C on this one - that node failure is gonna be faster than a cheetah on Red Bull.

upvoted 0 times

Lyda

17 days ago

We might need to consider some storage optimization to prevent any potential issues with the cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

1 months ago

Yeah, we need to keep an eye on that storage utilization. Option C does seem like a real possibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denise

1 months ago

I agree, 81% is cutting it close. Node failure could definitely be a risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hold up, are we talking about a four-node cluster or a four-legged chicken? Either way, 81% storage utilization is no joke. I'd have to go with C - that node failure is gonna be as inevitable as a bad pun from the guy next to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olen

2 months ago

Hmm, 81% huh? Sounds like the customer needs to start downsizing their VM collection before they end up with a storage disaster on their hands. I'd go with D on this one - the cluster is definitely not resilient enough to handle that kind of load.

upvoted 0 times

Erasmo

23 days ago

Yeah, definitely not a good situation to be in. They should definitely consider downsizing those VMs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

1 months ago

I agree, D seems like the best option here. The cluster won't be able to handle much more at 81%.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellen

2 months ago

But isn't option B saying that the cluster is resilient?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

2 months ago

I agree with you, Derick. Node failure could happen soon.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

2 months ago

81% storage utilization? That's cutting it close! Better start looking for a new cluster before the whole thing comes crashing down. I'm thinking option C is the way to go - node failure is just around the corner.

upvoted 0 times

Sena

18 days ago

Let's not wait for a node failure to happen. We should take action now to prevent any downtime.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

1 months ago

It's risky to run the cluster at such high utilization. We need to address this before it's too late.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barabara

1 months ago

I think we should consider adding more storage capacity to avoid any potential issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

1 months ago

I agree, 81% is definitely pushing it. Node failure could be right around the corner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

2 months ago

I think running the cluster at 81% storage utilization is risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nutanix Exam NCS-Core Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Allene

Lyda

Florinda

Denise

Rozella

Olen

Erasmo

Nicolette

Ellen

Vernell

Herminia

Sena

Johnna

Barabara

Yuette

Derick