Nutanix Exam NCP-MCI Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI exam

Question #: 26
Topic #: 2

[All NCP-MCI Questions]

A two-node ROBO cluster is configured with a witness VM.

What happens when Node A goes down?

AThe- cluster becomes unavailable and goes into read-only mode.

BAll operations and services on the Node B are shut down and go into a waiting state.

CThe cluster is unaffected and no administrator intervention is required.

DNode B sends a leadership request to the Witness VM and goes into single-node mode.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

According to the CPU (%) - VMware Docs web search result2, one of the possible causes of high CPU ready % is over-provisioning vCPUs for a VM or having too many VMs on a host. CPU ready % indicates the percentage of time that the VM was ready, but could not get scheduled to run on the physical CPU. High CPU ready % can lead to VM performance problems, such as slow response time or application latency. To improve VM performance, the administrator should reduce the number of vCPUs assigned to VMs or reduce the number of VMs on the hosts, so that there is less contention for CPU resources.

by Selma at Dec 07, 2024, 10:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-MCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Nan

1 months ago

Whoa, hold up! Option B sounds like a total shutdown. That can't be right. I'm feeling confident about Option C - let the cluster keep on trucking without any intervention.

upvoted 0 times

Albina

2 days ago

User 3: Yeah, I also think Option C is the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Skye

8 days ago

User 2: I think Option C makes more sense, let the cluster keep running smoothly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanora

14 days ago

User 1: I agree with you, Option B does sound extreme.

upvoted 0 times

...

Misty

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards Option A. Losing a node in a two-node cluster sounds like it would bring the whole thing down. Better play it safe, right?

upvoted 0 times

Arthur

13 days ago

User1: Definitely, it's always better to plan for potential failures in a cluster setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacob

22 days ago

User2: I agree, it's better to be prepared for the worst-case scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleonora

23 days ago

User1: I think you're right, Option A seems like the safest choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

2 months ago

Ha! Witness VMs, I've always thought they were more trouble than they're worth. Anyway, I'm going with Option D. Gotta love that single-node mode!

upvoted 0 times

Stephaine

23 days ago

Definitely, having Node B switch to single-node mode automatically is a great feature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

1 months ago

I think Option D is the way to go as well. It's good to have that failover in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Davida

1 months ago

Yeah, single-node mode is definitely convenient. No need to worry about the cluster going down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

2 months ago

I agree, Witness VMs can be a hassle. Option D does seem like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlota

2 months ago

Option C seems plausible, but I'm not entirely convinced. I'd need to double-check the specifics of ROBO cluster failover behavior to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

Amie

1 months ago

User 2: I agree, Node B would send a leadership request to the Witness VM.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jody

1 months ago

User 1: I think option D is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosann

2 months ago

But if Node A goes down, Node B should take over, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosann

2 months ago

I think the answer is D.

upvoted 0 times

...