Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-MCI-6.10 Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI-6.10 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All NCP-MCI-6.10 Questions]

The customer expects to maintain a cluster runway of 9 months. The customer doesn't have a budget for 6 months but they want to add new workloads to the existing cluster.

Based on the exhibit, what is required to meet the customer's budgetary timeframe?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The exhibit shows that the overall runway is only 66 days, meaning that the current cluster does not have enough capacity to sustain workloads for 6 months, let alone 9 months.

The best solution is to add resources to the cluster (Option A), such as CPU, memory, or storage, to extend the runway.

Postponing new workloads (Option B) may help in the short term but does not align with the business need to continue adding workloads.

Deleting workloads (Option C) is not a viable option because the customer wants to add more, not remove them.

Changing the target to 9 months (Option D) does not change the actual resource constraints; it only alters the target timeframe.


Nutanix Prism Central Capacity Planning and Runway Analysis

Nutanix Bible Cluster Resource Management and Scaling

Nutanix Support KB How to Extend Cluster Runway with Resource Scaling

Contribute your Thoughts:

Daren
2 days ago
I'd love to see the customer's face if we suggested deleting workloads. That's like telling them to do more with less. Option B all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
12 days ago
That could work too, but adding resources might be more efficient in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
14 days ago
Deleting workloads? That's just creating more problems! The customer wants to add new workloads, not reduce them. B is the clear choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
16 days ago
Adding resources to the cluster seems like the sensible solution here. The customer needs to maintain a 9-month runway, so B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
20 days ago
But wouldn't it be better to postpone the start of new workloads instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
22 days ago
I think we should add resources to the cluster to meet the customer's budgetary timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77